延续性护理干预对冠心病介入治疗患者的价值

The Value of Continuous Nursing Intervention in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Undergoing Interventional Therapy

目的研究冠心病患者经介入治疗后采取延续性护理干预措施的临床效果,并总结其对感染预防的价值。方法将2016年1月—2017年12月共收治的106例冠心病患者作为本次研究对象,2016年1—12月收治的53例作为对照组,2017年1—12月收治的53例作为研究组,所有患者均行介入治疗,两组患者分别行不同的护理方法,对照组患者行常规护理,研究组行延续性护理,比较两组患者的生活质量评分,观察两组患者1年内心绞痛的再次发作次数与再次住院的次数,并详细记录。结果研究组感染人数2例(3.77%),明显少于对照组的12例(22.64%),研究组在第3、6、12个月生活质量评分高于对照组,研究组1年内再次发作心绞痛23例,平均发病次数为(26.7±3.9)次,再住院次数为(6.5±2.2)次,对照组心绞痛1年内再次发作21例,平均发病次数为(15.2±2.8)次,再住院次数为(16.5±3.1)次,两组平均发作次数与再次住院次数比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。两组心绞痛发作人数比较差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论冠心病患者在介入治疗后行延续性护理措施的效果明显,值得应用。

Objective To study the clinical effect of continuous nursing intervention after interventional therapy in patients with coronary heart disease,and to summarize its value in infection prevention.Methods A total of 106 patients with coronary heart disease admitted to the hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled in the study.From January to December 2016,53 patients were treated as control group,From January to December 2017,53 cases were treated as study group.All patients underwent interventional therapy.Two groups of patients were given different nursing methods.The patients in the control group was given routine nursing,while those in the study group was given continuing nursing.The quality of life scores were compared between the two groups.The number of recurrent episodes and the number of rehospitalizations in patients with angina pectoris within 1 year were observed and recorded in detail.Results The number of infected patients in the study group was 2 cases(3.77%),which was significantly lower than that in the control group of 12 cases(12.64%).The quality of life scores in the 3rd,6th,and 12th months were higher in the study group than in the control group,and the study group recurred within 1 year.There were 23 cases of angina pectoris,the average number of cases was(26.7±3.9)times,the number of re-hospitalizations was(6.5±2.2)times,and the control group had 21 cases of angina pectoris within 1 year.The average number of cases was(15.2±2.8)times.After(16.5±3.1)times,the mean number of episodes in the two groups was compared with the number of re-hospitalizations,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the number of angina pectoris between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The effect of continuous nursing measures after interventional therapy is obvious in patients with coronary heart disease.