期刊文献+

探讨不同性别非静脉曲张上消化道出血在重症病房的临床特点 被引量:8

The clinical features of non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding with different genders in intensive care unit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同性别非静脉曲张上消化道出血(non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding,NVUGIB)在重症病房的临床特点。方法回顾性分析2015-2017年入住我院重症监护室的NVUGIB患者100例。所有患者严格按照Glasgow-Blatchford(GBS)评分进行筛选。按性别分组,并比较两组患者的临床特点及预后差异。结果 NVUGIB重症病房中常见病因为消化性溃疡,且性别差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);生命体征方面,男性组血压、血红蛋白及心率均较女性组差,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);男性组合并基础疾病患者比率较女性组高,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);男性组远期预后差且死亡率较女性组高,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论 NVUGIB重症病房中常见病因为消化性溃疡,且男性在生命体征(心率、血红蛋白)、基础疾病及远期预后方面均差于女性。 Objective To investigate the clinical features of non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding(NVUGIB)with different genders in intensive care unit.Methods One hundred cases of NVUGIB in the intensive care unit of our hospital from 2015 to 2017 were analyzed retrospectively.All patients were screened in strict accordance with Glasgow Blatchford score(GBS).Grouping by gender,clinical characteristics and prognosis were compared between two groups.Results The common diseases in the NVUGIB in intensive care unit were due to peptic ulcer,and the gender difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Vital signs,blood pressure,hemoglobin and heart rate were lower in male than those in female group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The ratio of basal disease in male group was higher than that in female group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The long-term prognosis of the male group was poor and the mortality was higher than that of the female group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Common diseases in the NVUGIB in intensive care unit were due to peptic ulcer.Male groups were poorer in vital signs(heart rate,hemoglobin),basic diseases and prognosis than those in female group.
作者 向红雨 周中银 XIANG Hongyu;ZHOU Zhongyin(Department of Gastroenterology,Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China)
出处 《胃肠病学和肝病学杂志》 CAS 2019年第1期75-78,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
基金 湖北省公益性科技计划项目(2013BKB013)
关键词 非静脉曲张上消化道出血 重症病房 Glasgow-Blatchford评分 性别 Non variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding Intensive care unit The Glasgow Blatchford scoring system Gender
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献44

  • 1LauJY, SungJ, HillC, et al. Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality[J]. Digestion, 2011,84(2):102–113. DOI: 10.1159/000323958.
  • 2RockeyDC. Occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: causes and clinical management[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010,7(5):265–279. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.42.
  • 3SrygleyFD, GerardoCJ, TranT, et al. Does this patient have a severe upper gastrointestinal bleed?[J]. JAMA, 2012,307(10):1072–1079. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.253.
  • 4BaiY, DuYQ, WangD, et al. Peptic ulcer bleeding in China: a multicenter endoscopic survey of 1006 patients[J]. J Dig Dis, 2014,15(1):5–11. DOI: 10.1111/1751–2980.12104.
  • 5RockallTA, LoganRF, DevlinHB, et al. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage[J]. Gut, 1996,38(3):316–321.
  • 6BlatchfordO, MurrayWR, BlatchfordM. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage[J]. Lancet, 2000,356(9238):1318–1321.
  • 7StanleyAJ, DaltonHR, BlatchfordO, et al. Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2011,34(4):470–475. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365–2036.2011.04747.x.
  • 8SaltzmanJR, TabakYP, HyettBH, et al. A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011,74(6):1215–1224. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.024.
  • 9YakaE, Y?lmazS, DogˇanN?,et al. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department[J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2015,22(1):22–30. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12554.
  • 10RobertsonM, MajumdarA, BoyapatiR, et al. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score to the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems[J/OL].Gastrointest Endosc, 2015 [2015-11-21]. http://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(15)03037-0/pdf.[published online ahead of print October 26, 2015]. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021.

共引文献150

同被引文献98

引证文献8

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部