摘要
2016年10月,著名作家金庸以备受追捧的同人小说《此间的少年》侵犯其著作权为由将该书作者江南告上法庭,将备受争议已久的"同人创作"问题直接推向了风口浪尖。"同人创作"的问题就在于可能会损害原有作品形象,会影响原著作者的再创作,以及会出现同人作品"搭顺风车"的情况。但是,严格限制同人创作势必会极大地限制创作自由,有悖于鼓励创新的价值理念。本文分别对不同类型"同人创作"的著作权适用性进行分析,为"同人创作"找出"合理使用"的空间,"同人创作"不应严格受限。
In October 2016,the famous writer Jin Yong sued jiangnan,the author of the popular fan fiction"teenagers here",on the ground that his copyright was infringed.This brought the controversial issue of"Doujin Work"directly to the forefront.The problem with"Doujin Work"is that it may damage the image of the original work,affect the re-creation of the original author,appears"Free Ride"in"Doujin Work".However,strict restrictions on peer creation are bound to greatly limit the freedom of creation,contrary to the value concept of encouraging innovation.This paper analyzes the copyright application of different types of"Doujin Work",and finds out the space of"fair use"for"Doujin Work"."Doujin Work"should not be strictly restricted.
出处
《产业创新研究》
2019年第1期101-103,共3页
Industrial Innovation
关键词
同人创作
分类
著作权
合理使用
"Doujin Work"
classification
copyright
fair use