期刊文献+

迭代最近点算法的改进策略 被引量:1

Improved Strategy of Iterative Closest Point Algorithm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 迭代最近点(Iterative Closest Point,ICP)算法是一种最为常见的点云配准方法,虽然配准精度高,但收敛速度慢,对含噪声、覆盖率较低点云的配准效果不佳。鉴于此,本文提出3种ICP算法的改进方法。针对含噪声的点云,采用概率ICP算法来抑制噪声点对配准结果的影响,提高配准精度;为了提高点云配准速度,采用坐标ICP算法实现点云的快速配准;针对低覆盖率点云,采用盒子ICP算法实现配准,可以大大提高配准精度和速度。通过兔子点云配准实验表明,3种改进的ICP算法在点云配准精度和速度方面都有很大程度的提高,均为有效的点云配准方法。 Iterative Closest Point(ICP)algorithm is the most common method of point cloud registration.Although its registration accuracy is high,the convergence speed is slow,and the registration effect of cloud with noise and low overlapping is not good.In view of this,three improved ICP algorithms are proposed in this paper.Aiming at the point cloud with noise,the probability ICP algorithm is used to suppress the influence of the noise points to the registration results and improve the registration accuracy.In order to improve the registration speed of the point cloud,the coordinate ICP algorithm is used to realize the rapid registration of the point cloud.Aiming at the low overlapping point clouds,the box ICP algorithm is used to improve the registration accuracy and speed.The registration experiment of rabbit point cloud shows that the three improved ICP algorithms have greatly improved the accuracy and speed of point cloud registration,and all are effective point cloud registration methods.
作者 赵夫群 方荣 ZHAO Fu-qun;FANG Rong(College of Education Science,Xianyang Normal University,Xianyang 712000,China)
出处 《计算机与现代化》 2019年第1期17-20,共4页 Computer and Modernization
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61731015) 咸阳发展研究院服务地方经济社会发展项目(2018XFY007) 咸阳师范学院青年骨干教师培养项目(XSYGG201621)
关键词 点云配准 迭代最近点 高斯概率 坐标轴 盒子结构 point cloud registration iterative closest point Gauss probability coordinate axis box structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献76

  • 1袁建英,王琼,李柏林.利用标志点多视图约束实现结构光扫描高精度粗拼接[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2015,27(4):674-683. 被引量:7
  • 2朱延娟,周来水,张丽艳.散乱点云数据配准算法[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2006,18(4):475-481. 被引量:96
  • 3Philips V M, Smuts N A. Facial reconstruction: utilization of computerized tomography to measure facial tissue thickness in a mixed racial population [J]. Forensic Science International, 1996, 83(1): 51-59.
  • 4Archer K M. Craniofacial reconstruction using hierarchical B-spline interpolation [D]. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 1997.
  • 5Turner W D, Brown R E B, Kelliher T P, et al. A novel method of automated skull registration for forensic facial approximation [J]. Forensic Science International, 2005, 154 (2) : 149-158.
  • 6Li J, Ma X Y, Lin Y L, et al. Craniofacial reconstruction based on MLS deformation [J]. WSEAS Transaction on Computers, 2010, 9(7): 758-767.
  • 7Berar M, Desvignes M, Bailly G, et al. 3D semi-landmarks- based statistical face reconstruction [J]. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 2006, 14(1): 31-43.
  • 8Lorensen W E, Cline H E. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm [J]. Computer Graphics, 1987, 21(4): 163-169.
  • 9Sharp G C, Lee S W, Wehe D K. Multiview registration of 3D scenes by minimizing error between coordinate frames [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2004, 26(8) : 1037-1050.
  • 10Besl P J, Mckay H D. A method for registration of 3-D shapes [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1992, 14(2): 239-256.

共引文献125

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部