摘要
被害人占有财物,是成立盗窃罪的前提。有无这种针对财物的事实性支配的占有,应根据社会一般观念进行判断,以占有的事实这种客观状态为中心,同时补充性地考察占有的意思。具体而言,(1)对被害人排他性支配的场所内的财物,能认定被害人的占有;(2)被害人虽忘记拿走财物,但能马上恢复对财物的直接性支配的场合,能认定被害人占有的持续;(3)在被害人有意识地将财物放置在特定场所的场合,如果这种"放置方式"符合社会一般观念,宜承认被害人的占有。另外,盗窃罪与侵占罪的根本区别不在于自己是否存在占有,而在于是否侵犯了对方的占有。
The possession of property by the victim is a prerequisite for the establishment of the crime of larceny.Whether the possession of the factual control over property should be judged according to the general concept of society and centered on the objective state of possession,at the same time,the meaning of possession is considered in a supplementary way.Specifically,(1)the property of the place where the victim is in exclusive control can identify the possession of the victim;(2)Although the victim forgot to take away the property,he can immediately restore the direct control of the property,the victim can identify the continued possession of the victim;(3)Where the victim intentionally places the property in a specific place,if the mode of placement conforms to the general concept of society,it is appropriate to recognize the possession of the victim.In addition,the fundamental difference between larceny and embezzlement does not lie in the existence of their own possession,but rather whether the infringement of the other??s possession.
出处
《法治现代化研究》
2019年第1期172-186,共15页
Law and Modernization
关键词
盗窃罪
占有
事实性支配
占有的归属
死者的占有
封缄物
theft
possession
factual domination
ownership of possession
possession of the dead
sealed object