减刑“财产性判项履行”认定疑难及解决

Difficulty and Resolution of Commutation “Property Judgment Performance”

自最高人民法院出台《关于办理减刑、假释案件具体应用法律的规定》(以下简称《司法解释》)并首次把财产性判项履行作为减刑考察因素以来,尽管各类减刑裁定文书中并没有载明以财产性判项作为裁定减刑的依据,但是事实上由于法院判决的刑事案件中财产刑性的比例非常大,财产性判决作为减刑综合考察因素几乎贯穿所有减刑的案件。目前有关减刑财产性判项的规定十分有限,现实中存在诸多问题,尤其在"财产性判项履行"认定上,包括履行能力认定、代履行认定以及部分履行等,破解当前存在的这些问题,完善"财产性判项履行"认定制度,对规范减刑制度具有重要意义。

Since the Supreme People's Court cChinese People's Public Security Universityame up《The provisions on the specific application of law on the handling of cases of commutation and parole》(Hereinafter referred to as"judicial interpretation")and for the first time,the property judgment has been carried out as an investigation factor for commutation of sentences.Although there is no evidence of the property judgment as the basis for the reduction of penalty in all kinds of commutation adjudication instruments,in fact,the proportion of property and punishment in criminal cases of court judgment is very large,and the property judgment,as a comprehensive investigation factor of commutation,almost runs through all cases of commutation.At present,there are very limited provisions on the subtraction of property penalty items,and there are many problems in reality,especially in the identification of"performance of property judgment items",including the identification of performance,the recognition of performance and partial performance and so on.To solve the existing problems,improve the identification system of the performance of property judgment,and reduce the standard,the penalty system is of great significance.