期刊文献+

DWI联合最小ADC值对鉴别诊断颅内孤立性纤维性肿瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤与脑膜瘤的价值 被引量:20

The value of DWI combined with minimum ADC value in differential diagnosis of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma and meningioma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的用扩散加权成像(diffusion weighted imaging,DWI)联合最小表观扩散系数(minimum apparent diffusion coefficient,MinADC)值鉴别诊断颅内孤立性纤维性肿瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤(solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma,SFT/HPC)与脑膜瘤,以提高术前诊断准确率。材料与方法回顾性分析2012年3月至2018年8月我院经手术病理证实的颅内10例SFT/HPC (WHOⅡ级)患者与22例脑膜瘤(WHOⅡ级)患者的术前临床资料、DWI特征及病理资料,在ADC图上测量两者的MinADC值并进行比较。通过Welch检验进行两组MinADC值的比较,运用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristiccurve,ROC曲线),评价MinADC值的鉴别诊断价值。结果在10例SFT/HPC中,肿瘤实性成分在DWI上8例呈等信号,2例呈稍高信号,MinADC平均值为(1.16±0.23)×10-3 mm2/s;在22例脑膜瘤中,肿瘤实性成分在DWI上18例呈稍高信号,2例呈等信号,2例明显高信号,MinADC值平均值为(0.80±0.12)×10-3mm2/s,小于SFT/HPC,两组肿瘤实性成分MinADC值比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。以MinADC值0.90×10-3 mm2/s为阈值诊断SFT/HPC与脑膜瘤,ROC曲线下面积为0.92±0.32,敏感度为97.6%,特异度为94.3%,与病理组织学结果行一致性检验,SFT/HPC的重复测量的Kappa值为0.91,脑膜瘤的Kappa值为0.87。结论 MinADC值可以作为一种量化工具区分颅内SFT/HPC与脑膜瘤,提高术前诊断准确率。 Objective:Differential diagnosis of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma(SFT/HPC)and meningioma by diffusion weighted imaging(DWI)combined with minimum apparent diffusion coefficient(MinADC)to improve preoperative diagnostic accuracy.Materials and Methods:Retrospective analysis of preoperative clinical data,DWI characteristics and pathological data of 10 patients with SFT/HPC(WHOⅡgrade)and 22 patients with meningioma(WHOⅡgrade)confirmed by surgery and pathology from March 2012 to August 2018.MinADC value of the SFT/HPCs(n=10)was measured on ADC map and was compared with that of meningiomas(n=22).Comparison of MinADC values between SFT/HPC and meningioma was conducted by Welch test.Using the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC curve)to evaluate the differential diagnosis value of MinADC value.Results:In 10 cases of SFT/HPC,the solid components of the tumor showed equal signal(n=8)and slightly higher signal(n=2)on DWI,the mean value of MinADC was(1.16±0.23)×10^-3 mm^2/s.In 22 cases of meningioma,the solid components of the tumor showed slightly higher signal(n=18)and equal signal(n=2)and high signal(n=2)on DWI,the mean value of MinADC was(0.80±0.12)×10^-3 mm^2/s,less than that of SFT/HPC,the difference of MinADC values between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.01).For the differentiation between SFT/HPC and meningioma,the critical cutoff MinADC value was 0.90×10^-3 mm^2/s,which provided the best combination of sensitivity(97.6%)and specificity(94.3%),the area under the ROC curve was 0.92±0.32,corresponding to histopathological findings,the Kappa value of the repeat measurements was 0.91 for SFT/HPC and 0.87 for meningioma,which indicated a good concordance of the results.Conclusions:MinADC value can be used as a quantitative tool to distinguish intracranial SFT/HPC from meningioma and improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis.
作者 梁小红 周青 赵志勇 柯晓艾 韩蕾 周俊林 LIANG Xiaohong;ZHOU Qing;ZHAO Zhiyong;KE Xiaoai;HAN Lei;ZHOU Junlin(Radiology Imaging Center,Second Hospital of Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730030,China)
出处 《磁共振成像》 CAS 2019年第1期8-13,共6页 Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
基金 甘肃省卫生行业科研计划项目(编号:GSWSKY2016-06) 兰州大学第二医院博士科研基金(编号:2015-1-04)~~
关键词 脑肿瘤 孤立性纤维瘤 血管外皮细胞瘤 磁共振成像 brain neoplasms solitary fibrous tumors hemangiopericytoma magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1Amol J. Ghia,Eric L. Chang,Pamela K. Allen,Anita Mahajan,Marta Penas-Prado,Ian E. McCutcheon,Paul D. Brown.Intracranial Hemangiopericytoma: Patterns of Failure and the Role of Radiation Therapy[J].Neurosurgery.2013(4)
  • 2Valeria Righi,Vitaliano Tugnoli,Adele Mucci,Antonella Bacci,Sergio Bonora,Luisa Schenetti.MRS study of meningeal hemangiopericytoma and edema: A comparison withmeningothelial meningioma[J].Oncology Reports.2012(4)
  • 3Narendra Kumar,Ritesh Kumar,Rakesh Kapoor,Sushmita Ghoshal,Pramod Kumar,Pravin Salunke,B. Radotra,Suresh Sharma.Intracranial meningeal hemangiopericytoma: 10?years experience of a tertiary care Institute[J].Acta Neurochirurgica.2012(9)
  • 4Heidrun Holland,Michela Livrea,Peter Ahnert,Ronald Koschny,Holger Kirsten,Jürgen Meixensberger,Manfred Bauer,Ralf Schober,Dominik Fritzsch,Wolfgang Krupp.Intracranial hemangiopericytoma: Case study with cytogenetics and genome wide SNP-A analysis[J].Pathology - Research and Practice.2011(5)
  • 5Henry Dufour,Philippe Métellus,Stéphane Fuentes,Xavier Murracciole,Jean Régis,Dominique Figarella-Branger,Fran?ois Grisoli.Meningeal Hemangiopericytoma: A Retrospective Study of 21 Patients with Special Review of Postoperative External Radiotherapy[J].Neurosurgery.2001(4)
  • 6Barton L. Guthrie,Michael J. Ebersold,Bernd W. Scheithauer,Edward G. Shaw.Meningeal Hemangiopericytoma: Histopathological Features, Treatment, and Long-Term Follow-up of 44 Cases[J].Neurosurgery.1989(4)
  • 7K. Fountas,E. Kapsalaki,M. Kassam,C. Feltes,V. Dimopoulos,J. Robinson,J. Smith.Management of intracranial meningeal hemangiopericytomas: outcome and experience[].Neurosurgical Review.2006
  • 8Schiariti M,Goetz P,El-Maghraby H,et al.Hemangiopericytoma:long-term outcome revisited[].Journal of Neurosurgery.2011
  • 9刘梅丽,韩彤,刘力,崔世民.中枢神经系统血管外皮细胞瘤的MRI表现与病理分析[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2007,13(6):389-396. 被引量:17
  • 10Commins DL, Atkinson RD, Burnett ME. Review of meningioma histopathology. Neurosurgical focus, 2007, 23(4): E3.

共引文献38

同被引文献96

引证文献20

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部