期刊文献+

Unnecessity of lymph node regression evaluation for predicting gastric adenocarcinoma outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy 被引量:2

Unnecessity of lymph node regression evaluation for predicting gastric adenocarcinoma outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been applied worldwide to improve the survival of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma(GAC). The evaluation of histological regression in primary tumors is valuable for predicting prognosis. However, the prognostic effect of regression change in lymph nodes(LNs) remains unclear.AIM To confirm whether the evaluation of regression change in LNs could predict the prognosis of GAC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.METHODS In this study, we evaluated the histological regression of resected LNs from 192 GAC patients(including those with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma)treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We classified regression change and residual tumor in LNs into four groups:(A) true negative LNs with no evidence of a preoperative therapy effect,(B) no residual metastasis but the presence of regression change in LNs,(C) residual metastasis with regression change in LNs,and(D) metastasis with minimal or no regression change in LNs. Correlations between regression change and residual tumor groups in LNs and regression change in the primary tumor, as well as correlations between regression change in LNs and clinicopathological characteristics, were analyzed. The prognostic effect of regression change and residual tumor groups in LNs was also analyzed.RESULTS We found that regression change and residual tumor groups in LNs were significantly correlated with regression change in the primary tumor, tumor differentiation, ypT stage, ypN stage, ypTNM stage, lymph-vascular invasion,perineural invasion and R0 resection status. Regression change and residual tumor groups in LNs were statistically significant using univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, but were not independent predictors. For patients who had no residual tumor in LNs, the 5-year overall survival(OS) rates were 67.5% in Group A and 67.4% in Group B. For the patients who had residual tumors in LNs, the 5-year OS rates were 28.2% in Group C and 39.5% in Group D.The patients in Groups A+B had a significantly better outcome than the patients in Groups C+D(P < 0.01). No significant differences in survival were found between Groups A and B, or between Groups C and D.CONCLUSION The existence of residual tumor in LNs, rather than regression change in LNs, is useful for predicting the prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in GAC patients. In practice, it may not be necessary to report regression change in LNs. BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been applied worldwide to improve the survival of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma(GAC). The evaluation of histological regression in primary tumors is valuable for predicting prognosis. However, the prognostic effect of regression change in lymph nodes(LNs) remains unclear.AIM To confirm whether the evaluation of regression change in LNs could predict the prognosis of GAC patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.METHODS In this study, we evaluated the histological regression of resected LNs from 192 GAC patients(including those with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma)treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We classified regression change and residual tumor in LNs into four groups:(A) true negative LNs with no evidence of a preoperative therapy effect,(B) no residual metastasis but the presence of regression change in LNs,(C) residual metastasis with regression change in LNs,and(D) metastasis with minimal or no regression change in LNs. Correlations between regression change and residual tumor groups in LNs and regression change in the primary tumor, as well as correlations between regression change in LNs and clinicopathological characteristics, were analyzed. The prognostic effect of regression change and residual tumor groups in LNs was also analyzed.RESULTS We found that regression change and residual tumor groups in LNs were significantly correlated with regression change in the primary tumor, tumor differentiation, ypT stage, ypN stage, ypTNM stage, lymph-vascular invasion,perineural invasion and R0 resection status. Regression change and residual tumor groups in LNs were statistically significant using univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, but were not independent predictors. For patients who had no residual tumor in LNs, the 5-year overall survival(OS) rates were 67.5% in Group A and 67.4% in Group B. For the patients who had residual tumors in LNs, the 5-year OS rates were 28.2% in Group C and 39.5% in Group D.The patients in Groups A+B had a significantly better outcome than the patients in Groups C+D(P < 0.01). No significant differences in survival were found between Groups A and B, or between Groups C and D.CONCLUSION The existence of residual tumor in LNs, rather than regression change in LNs, is useful for predicting the prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in GAC patients. In practice, it may not be necessary to report regression change in LNs.
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology》 SCIE CAS 2019年第1期48-58,共11页 世界胃肠肿瘤学杂志(英文版)(电子版)
基金 CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences,No.2016-I2M-3-005 the Beijing Hope Run Special Fund,No.LC2015A03 and No.LC2013B34
关键词 GASTRIC cancer NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY LYMPH NODES Regression Residual tumor Regression change Gastric cancer Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Lymph nodes Regression Residual tumor Regression change
  • 相关文献

同被引文献8

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部