期刊文献+

辱虐管理与员工创造力:心理契约破坏和中庸思维的不同作用 被引量:42

Linking abusive supervision with employee creativity:The roles of psychological contract breach and Zhongyong thinking style
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,辱虐管理与员工创造力的关系受到越来越多研究者的关注。在以往研究的基础上,本研究构建了一个有调节的中介作用模型,以探讨中国文化情境下辱虐管理影响员工创造力的中介心理机制及边界条件。采用多阶段-多来源的策略,以93名主管和369名员工为对象,通过多水平结构方程建模技术对三阶段主管-员工配对调查所获取的数据进行分析,结果表明:主管的辱虐管理行为会通过心理契约破坏的中介作用,对员工创造力产生间接的消极影响;但该负向的间接关系的强度对高中庸思维者而言较弱。本研究有助于揭示辱虐管理影响员工创造力的心理机制及边界条件,研究结果对企业员工创造力及创新行为的管理实践也有一定启示。 Although creativity has been recognized as an important employee outcome related with work context,to date little research has examined the relationship between abusive supervision and employee creativity,which has perhaps been hindered by the lack of a theoretical framework outlining the mechanisms underlying this relationship.The current study examined the processes linking abusive supervision to employee creativity in the Chinese context by focusing on the mediating influence of psychological contract breach and the moderating influence of Zhongyong thinking style.We collected data from 93 supervisors and 369 subordinates at three different time points.In the first survey,the subordinates were asked to provide information about abusive supervision and their demography.One week later,these subordinates were asked to answer some questions about psychological contract breach and Zhongyong thinking style.Approximately two months later,we asked these supervisors to rate their subordinates'creativity.Multi-level structuring equation modeling technique and Monte Carlo resampling method were employed to examine the hypothesis about the moderating role of Zhongyong thinking style in the indirect relationship between abusive supervision and employee creativity through psychological contract breach.These findings provided support for the hypothesis that the indirect relationship between abusive supervision and employee creativity through psychological contract breach is moderated by Zhongyong thinking style,such that the indirect relationship is weakened when Zhongyong thinking style is high,rather than low.These findings contribute to our understanding of the relationship between abusive supervision and employee creativity in the Chinese context,and imply that the negative influence of abusive supervision on employee outcomes could be decreased by guiding employees to cultivate Zhongyong thinking style because it can encourage self-regulation of behavior after experiencing abusive supervision.
作者 沈伊默 马晨露 白新文 诸彦含 鲁云林 张庆林 刘军 SHEN Yimo;MA Chenlu;BAI Xinwen;ZHU Yanhan;LU Yunlin;ZHANG Qinglin;LIU Jun(School of Psychology,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China;Business School,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China;CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science,Institute of Psychology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;School of Political Science and Public Administration,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715,China;School of Business and Law,Jiangsu Second Normal University,Nanjing 210029,China)
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第2期238-247,共10页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家杰出青年科学基金项目"组织行为"(71425003) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71872152 71871214 31671125) 中央高校基本科研业务经费创新团队项目(SWU1709123)和重点项目(SWU1709238)资助
关键词 辱虐管理 心理契约破坏 中庸思维 创造力 abusive supervision psychological contract breach Zhongyong thinking style creativity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献120

  • 1施承孙,钱铭怡.羞耻和内疚的差异[J].心理科学进展,1999,9(1):35-38. 被引量:48
  • 2龙立荣,刘亚.组织不公正及其效果研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(4):584-593. 被引量:59
  • 3侯玉波,朱滢.文化对中国人思维方式的影响[J].心理学报,2002,34(1):106-111. 被引量:112
  • 4林帼儿,陈子光,钟建安.组织公平文献综述及未来的研究方向[J].心理科学,2006,29(4):1016-1018. 被引量:38
  • 5杨中芳.《中国人的世界观:中庸实践思维初探》,载杨中芳.《如何理解中国人》,台北,远流书店,2001.
  • 6Harvey, P. , Stoner, J. , Hochwarter, W. , &Kacmar, C. (2007) Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. Leadership Quarterly,18,264 -280.
  • 7Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • 8Hoobler, J. , &Brass, D. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology,91,1125 - 1133.
  • 9House, R. J. , & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic, and Chemmers, & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research:Perspectives and directions ( pp. 577 - 594). New York: Academic Press.
  • 10Howell, J. M. , &Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review,30,96 - 112.

共引文献253

同被引文献595

引证文献42

二级引证文献147

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部