摘要
[目的/意义]随着科学合作的日益密切,合著论文数量日益增多,如何分配合著论文中不同作者的科研贡献,成为科研评估中的重要问题。不同的合著论文计数方法将对国家、机构、科研人员的排名产生不同程度的影响。[方法/过程]在介绍几种基本计数方法的基础上,讨论不同计数方法对国家、机构、个人科技排名的影响,并分析了计数方法与领域标准化的关系。[结果/结论]在比较国家、机构、作者的科研实力时,分数计数方法比全计数方法更恰当。同样,在比较不同领域的科研产出和影响力时,与全计数方法相比,分数计数方法可以得到更合理的标准化结果。
[Purpose/Significance]With the increasingly close scientific cooperation,the number of co-authored papers is increasing,and how to assign the research contributions to different authors in the co-authored paper is an important issue in the evaluation of scientific research.Different counting methods of co-authors can have a different influence on the ranking of countries,institutions and researchers.[Method/Process]On the basis of introducing several basic counting methods,this paper discusses the influence of different counting methods on national,institution and individual research ranking,and analyzes the relationship between counting method and field normalization.[Result/Conclusion]In comparison with the scientific research strength of the country,institution and author,the fractional counting method is more exact than the full counting method.Similarly,in comparing the output and influence of scientific research in different fields,the fractional counting method can obtain more proper field-normalized results than the full counting method.
作者
张丽华
田丹
Zhang Lihua;Tian Dan(Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006)
出处
《情报杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第1期187-193,共7页
Journal of Intelligence
基金
中国博士后科学基金资助项目"研究评估中科学计量学的不确定性现象及应对策略研究"(编号:2018M631551)研究成果之一
关键词
科研合作
计数方法
科研评估
合著论文
scientific collaboration
counting method
research evaluation
co-authored paper