期刊文献+

3种玻璃陶瓷与Wieland Zenostar氧化锆相互摩擦的耐磨性比较 被引量:1

Comparison of wear resistance of three kinds of glass ceramics and Wieland Zenostar zircona
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨3种玻璃陶瓷与Wieland Zenostar氧化锆(简称Zenostar)相互摩擦的耐磨性差异,阐明其影响因素。方法:Zenostar做成平面型(锆片组)和半球型(锆球组),3种玻璃陶瓷IPS Empress CAD (简称Empress)、IPS e.max CAD (简称e.max)和VITA Suprinity (简称Suprinity)分别作为其对磨材料,置于UMT-2微摩擦磨损试验机上,在人工唾液环境下进行二体磨损,模拟口腔内使用过程。使用激光共聚焦显微镜检测平面试样的磨损深度,扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察分析磨损表面。结果:锆片组,3种玻璃陶瓷对Zenostar产生的最大磨损深度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);锆球组,Zenostar对3种玻璃陶瓷及Zenostar基底样本产生的最大磨损深度由小到大依次为Zenostar组<e.max组≈Empress组<Suprinity组,e.max组与Empress组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其余各组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。SEM观察,锆片组中Zenostar磨损表面均较光滑,多为磨粒磨损;锆球组中Empress表面磨损最为严重,可见大面积碎片剥脱面,表面粗糙不平。结论:3种玻璃陶瓷与Zenostar相互摩擦的耐磨性与材料本身组成成分和化学结构有关。 Objective:To explore the differences of wear resistance of three kinds of glass ceramics and Wieland Zenostar zircona(Zenostar),and to clarify their influencing factors.Methods:Zenostar were made into flat-shaped specimens(zirconia base sample group)and hemisphere-shaped specimens(zirconia pair grinding group).There kinds of glass ceramics IPS Empress(Empress),IPS e.max CAD(e.max),VITA Suprinity(Suprinty)were used as base specimens.Each group was exposed to UMT-2 testing machine to simulate the clinical service.The wear depthes of base specimens were detected by laser confocal scanning.Scanning electron microscope(SEM)was used to evaluate the wear surfaces.Results:In zirconia base sample group,there were no significant differences in the maximum wear depthes to Zenostar between the three kinds of glass ceramics(P>0.05).In zirconia pair grinding group,the maximum wear depthes ranked as follows:Zenostar group<e.max group≈Empress group<Suprinity group;there was no significant difference between e.max group and Empress group(P>0.05),but there were significant differences between other groups(P<0.01).The SEM results showed that the wearing surface of the Zenostar in zirconia base sample group was relatively smooth;whereas the wearing surface of Empress in zirconia pair grinding group was rougher with alarge area of clebris desquamation surface.Conclusion:The wear resistance of the three kinds of glass ceramics to Zenostar is related to the compositions and the chemical structures of materials.
作者 周园园 朱亚平 秦娇娇 李怡然 吴庆翠 王成坤 焦珊 ZHOU Yuanyuan;ZHU Yaping;QIN Jiaojiao;LI Yiran;WU Qingcui;WANG Chengkun;JIAO Shan(Department of Endodontic,Stomatology Hospital,Jilin University,Changchun 130021,China)
出处 《吉林大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第1期83-87,共5页 Journal of Jilin University:Medicine Edition
基金 吉林省科技厅科技发展计划项目资助课题(20140414010GH)
关键词 玻璃陶瓷 氧化锆 摩擦磨损 磨损深度 glass ceramic zirconia friction and wear wear depth
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献128

  • 1孙强,白冰,郝玉全,闻雷,孙建男,艾红军.CAD/CAM加工的渗透陶瓷的弯曲强度和Weibull分析[J].上海口腔医学,2004,13(6):549-552. 被引量:4
  • 2侯玉,武俊杰,张林祺.渗透陶瓷性能的研究进展[J].国外医学(口腔医学分册),2005,32(5):368-369. 被引量:3
  • 3Rosenblum MA,Schulman A.A review of all-ceramic restorations[J].J Am Dent Assoc,1997,128(3):297-307.
  • 4Seghi RR,Rosenstiel SF,Bauer P.Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro[J].J Dent Res,1991,70(3):221-225.
  • 5Holland RI.Galvanic currents between gold and amalgam[J].Scand J Dent Res,1980,88(3):269-272.
  • 6Gohring TN,Besek M J,Schmidlin PR.Attritional wear and abrasive surface alterations of composite resin materials in vitro[J].J Dent,2002,30(2/3):119-127.
  • 7Smith BG,Bartlett DW,Robb ND.The prevalence,etiology and management of tooth wear in the United Kingdom[J].J Prosthet Dent,1997,78 (4):367-372.
  • 8Mair LH,Stolarski TA,Vowles RW,et al.Wear:Mechanisms,manifestations and measurement Report of a workshop[J].J Dent,1996,24(1/2):141-148.
  • 9Oh WS,Delong R,Anusavice KJ.Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear:A literature review[J].J Prosthet Dent,2002,87(4):451-459.
  • 10Yu HY,Zhou ZR,He LH.The friction and wear behavior of dental porcelains with different surface strengthing techniques[J].Key Engineering Materials,2005,288(1):637-640.

共引文献28

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部