期刊文献+

染色体微阵列分析技术的适宜产前诊断应用策略 被引量:18

Clinical pathway selection based on chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 染色体微阵列分析(chromosomal microarray analysis,CMA)是产前诊断领域的一项新兴技术,不仅可准确检测染色体数目及大片段结构是否异常,而且可以检测微缺失/微重复等微结构变异,具有分辨率高、检测周期短、结果客观等优势。但CMA对平衡易位、倒位及低水平嵌合等检出存在一定的局限性。现总结CMA的3种临床应用模式:一是针对胎儿出现某些特定结构异常的孕妇进行CMA;二是所有孕妇先选择无创性产前筛查方法锁定高危人群后行CMA;三是普查模式,即均直接选择CMA进行产前诊断。 Chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA)is an emerging approach in prenatal diagnosis.Apart from accurate identification of the number of chromosomes and major chromosomal aneuploidy,CMA can also be used to detect submicroscopic changes such as chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications with high-resolution,short turnaround time and objectivity.However,CMA is limited in detecting balanced translocation,inversion of chromosomes and low-level mosaicism.This review summarized three clinical situations where CMA is mainly applied:fetus with certain structural abnormalities in ultrasound scan,high-risk gravidas identified by non-invasive prenatal testing and general screening for all for prenatal diagnosis.
作者 王淑娴 马京梅 Wang Shuxian;Ma Jingmei(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Peking University First Hospital; Beijing Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus,Beijing 100034,China)
出处 《中华围产医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第1期26-29,共4页 Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine
关键词 染色体畸变 染色体缺失 微阵列分析 产前诊断 Chromosome aberrations Chromosome deletion Microarray analysis Prenatal diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献7

  • 1Brady PD, Vermeesch JR. Genomic microarrays: a technology overview[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012,32:336-343.
  • 2Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2010,86: 749-764.
  • 3Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, et al. Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013,41:610-620.
  • 4Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, et al. Experience with microarray-based comparative genomie hybridization for prental diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012,32: 976-985.
  • 5Shaffer LG, Dosenfeld JA, Dabell MP, et al. Detection rates of clinically significant genomie alterations by mieroarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012,32:986-995.
  • 6Wapner R J, Marthin CL, Lery B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prental diagnosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367:2175-2184.
  • 7American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2013,122:1374-1377.

共引文献254

同被引文献110

引证文献18

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部