摘要
通过综述我国环境影响后评价与环境影响评价的发展近况、理论内涵、适用对象、工作程序、评价方法以及作用与意义,对比分析了两者之间的联系与区别,为我国环境影响后评价制度的实施开展及工作重点提供研究依据,从而促进环境影响后评价制度体系的不断健全完善。
The paper compares environmental impact assessment follow-up and environmental impact assessment system in China in terms of their theoretical connotation, objects, procedures, evaluation methods and functions, analyzes and summarizes the connection and distinction between them, in order to clarify the future focus of environmental impact assessment follow-up, promote the development of environmental impact assessment follow-up theory, and improve the scientific nature of environmental assessment system.
作者
王卫红
孙慧
赵东风
安慧
江少文
李石
WANG Weihong;SUN Hui;ZHAO Dongfeng;AN Hui;JIANG Shaowen;LI Shi(Department of Environmental and Safety Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China;Qingdao Oasis Environmental & Safety Technology Co. , Ltd. , Qingdao 266555, China;Center for Safety,Environmental &Energy Conservation Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China)
出处
《环境影响评价》
2019年第1期41-45,共5页
Environmental Impact Assessment
关键词
环境影响后评价
环境影响评价
对比分析
科学性
准确性
environmental impact assessment follow-up
environmental impact assessment
comparative analysis
scientificity
accuracy