期刊文献+

MiniQuest模式在《中医临床护理学》教学中的应用研究 被引量:5

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨MiniQuest模式在《中医临床护理学》教学中对护理本科生评判性思维能力及教学效果的影响。方法将我院2015级护理专业4班、5班学生分为对照组和试验组,试验组采取MiniQuest与传统教学相结合的模式,对照组采取以教师讲授为主的传统教学模式。采用评判性思维量表对两组学生评判性思维能力进行评价,采用自制教学效果问卷对试验组进行教学效果评价。结果评判性思维能力方面,试验组在总分、开放思想、分析能力、系统化能力、求知欲、评判思维自信心方面的得分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);自制教学效果评价问卷结果显示,92.85%的学生支持MiniQuest的教学方法,82.14%的学生认为该教学方法可以有效的对不同患者实施辨证施护。结论 MiniQuest模式有助于提高护理本科生评判性思维能力及辨证施护的能力。
出处 《牡丹江医学院学报》 2019年第1期157-159,共3页 Journal of Mudanjiang Medical University
基金 安徽省教育厅精品资源共享课(2016gxk076) 安徽中医药大学质量工程项目(2016zlgc018)
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1蒋艳,沈宁,严燕,邹树芳.护理本科生毕业实习临床实践行为表现自评量表的研制[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(7):638-640. 被引量:32
  • 2Facione PA, Facione NC, Giancario CAF. The California critical thinking disposition inventory, CCTDI scoring supplement. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 2000.
  • 3Facione PA, Facione NC. The California critical thinking disposition inventory (CCTDI). Test administration manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press, 1992.
  • 4Ip WY, Lee DTF, Lee IFK, et al. Disposition towards critical thinking: a study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32(1):84-90.
  • 5Yeh ML. Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the california critical thinking disposition inventory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2002, 39(2):123-132.
  • 6Albert RT, Albert RE, Radsma J. Relationships among bilingualism, critical thinking ability, and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2002, 18(4):220-229.
  • 7Chan S. The Chinese learner - a question of style. Education and Training, 1999, 41(6/7):294-304.
  • 8Gao G. ''Don't take my word for it.''- understanding Chinese speaking practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1998, 22(2):163-186.
  • 9Biggs J. Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In: Watkins DA, Biggs JB, eds. The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological, and contextual influences. Hong Kong and Australia: CERC and ACER, 1996. 45-67.
  • 10American Philosophical Association. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report: Research findings and recommendations prepared for the committee on pre-college philosophy(ER

共引文献1875

同被引文献52

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部