期刊文献+

“三权分置”视域中的农村土地信托模式比较研究 被引量:4

Comparative Study of Rural Land Trust Models in Perspective of “Separation of Three Rights”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 农村土地"三权分置"改革是新时代农地制度顶层设计的重大创新,所有权、承包权、经营权分置并行满足农民既保留土地承包权又能流转土地经营权的意愿,对于促进土地要素利用效率提升和助力乡村振兴战略具有重大意义。如何使农村土地经营权流转更加适应让市场在资源配置中起决定性作用的要求,是现代化经济体系构建和中国特色社会主义制度创新亟待解决的重要热点问题。基于"三权分置"视角,将土地信托作为放活土地经营权的有效途径,研究比较不同地区农村土地信托的典型模式,并借鉴美、日发达国家土地信托的制度设计,特别是在制度保障、政府职能、金融支持及风险防范等四个方面提出相应的政策措施,对于进一步完善我国农村土地信托制度至关重要。 The reform of“Separation of Three Rights”in rural land is a major innovation in the top-level design of farmland system in the new era.Parallel division of ownership,contracting rights and management rights satisfies the farmers’willingness to retain land contracting rights and transfer land management rights.It is of great significance to promote the improvement of use efficiency land factors and assist the rural revitalization strategy.How to make the circulation of rural land management rights more suitable for the require of market playing a decisive role in the resources allocation is an important hot issue to be solved urgently in the construction of modern economic system and the innovation of socialist system with Chinese characteristics.Based on the perspective of“Separation of Three Rights”,taking land trust as an effective way to release land management rights,studying and comparing typical models of rural land trust in different regions,and drawing lessons from the system design of land trust in the United States and Japan,especially putting forward corresponding policy measures in four aspects,such as system guarantee,government function,financial support and risk prevention,are of vital importance to further improving rural land trust system in China.
作者 李泉 李梦 鲁科技 Li Quan;Li Meng;Lu Keji(School of Economics,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China)
出处 《山东农业科学》 2019年第1期161-167,共7页 Shandong Agricultural Sciences
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助重点项目"农村宅基地转让制度改革实践调查研究"(16LZUJBWZD004)
关键词 三权分置 土地经营权流转 土地信托模式 比较研究 Separation of Three Rights Transfer of land management rights Land trust model Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献131

共引文献131

同被引文献73

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部