期刊文献+

创新理论考核对于提升物理治疗专业学生批判性思维能力的研究 被引量:2

Theoretical Innovation Assessment Used to Improve the Critical Thinking Ability of Physical Therapy Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨创新理论考核在提升物理治疗专业学生临床思维推理能力方面的研究。方法:将我校68名2014级物理治疗专业的学生随机分为观察组与对照组各34例,所有学生均接受同一个老师教授《骨科疾病物理治疗》课程,观察组理论考核采用创新考核方法,对照组采用传统考核方法,比较2组的成绩,采用世界物理治疗师联盟(WCPT)认证的教学效果评价表(SEEQ)评价教学效果,通过批判性思维能力(中文版)测量表(CTDI-CV)对物理治疗专业学生批判性思维能力做重点评价。结果:观察组理论考核成绩与对照组无统计学差异;观察组教学效果评价单项学习、考核得分高于对照组(P<0.05);批判性思维能力测量表中寻求真相、分析能力、批判思维的自信心方面观察组均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:理论创新考核能够有效提高物理治疗专业学生对专业课的学习兴趣及价值感,更有利于提升物理治疗专业学生批判性思维能力。 Objective:To explore the theoretical innovation assessment in improving the critical thinking ability of physical therapy students.Methods:Sixty-eight physical therapy students of grade 2014 in Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,and taught by the same teacher in"Physical therapy of muscleskeletal diseases".The experimental group was given theoretical innovation assessment,and the control group was given traditional evaluation method.The theoretical assessment results were compared between two groups.The Student Evaluation of Educational Quality(SEEQ)certified by WCPT was used to evaluate the teaching effect.The critical thinking ability was evaluated by the Chinese Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory(CTDI-CV).Using SPSS software,the evaluation results were statistically analyzed.Results:There was no significant difference in theoretical assessment results between the experimental group and the control group(P >0.05).The scores of learning and examinations in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).In the Chinese Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory,the experimental group was superior to the control group in truth-seeking,analyticity,and self-confidence of critical thinking(P<0.05).Conclusion:The theoretical innovation assessment can effectively improve the interest and value of physiotherapy students in this courses,promote independent learning ability,and also encourage the students to think critically and analyze problems in a more systematic way.Meanwhile,it is also considered that tests requiring thinking rather than relying on memory are more suitable for subjects.The Innovative theoretical assessment is more beneficial to improve students’ critical thinking ability than traditional assessment model.
作者 苟艳芸 江征 陶静 王芗斌 谢秋蓉 罗佳 Gou Yanyun;Jiang Zheng;Tao Jing(Department of Physical Therapy,College of Rehabilitation Medicine,Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Fuzhou 350122,China)
机构地区 福建中医药大学
出处 《中国康复》 2019年第1期54-56,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation
基金 2016年福建省本科高校教育教学改革研究项目(JZ160129) 福建中医药大学教学改革研究项目(XJJGY1713)
关键词 理论创新考核 批判性思维 物理治疗教学 Theoretical innovation assessment Critical thinking Physical therapy teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1常华,张琦.“以问题为基础”教学法在康复治疗学专业运动疗法方向教学中的应用分析[J].中国康复理论与实践,2007,13(8):787-788. 被引量:45
  • 2Facione PA, Facione NC, Giancario CAF. The California critical thinking disposition inventory, CCTDI scoring supplement. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press, 2000.
  • 3Facione PA, Facione NC. The California critical thinking disposition inventory (CCTDI). Test administration manual. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press, 1992.
  • 4Ip WY, Lee DTF, Lee IFK, et al. Disposition towards critical thinking: a study of Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000, 32(1):84-90.
  • 5Yeh ML. Assessing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the california critical thinking disposition inventory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2002, 39(2):123-132.
  • 6Albert RT, Albert RE, Radsma J. Relationships among bilingualism, critical thinking ability, and critical thinking disposition. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2002, 18(4):220-229.
  • 7Chan S. The Chinese learner - a question of style. Education and Training, 1999, 41(6/7):294-304.
  • 8Gao G. ''Don't take my word for it.''- understanding Chinese speaking practices. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1998, 22(2):163-186.
  • 9Biggs J. Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In: Watkins DA, Biggs JB, eds. The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological, and contextual influences. Hong Kong and Australia: CERC and ACER, 1996. 45-67.
  • 10American Philosophical Association. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi Report: Research findings and recommendations prepared for the committee on pre-college philosophy(ER

共引文献1835

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部