期刊文献+

腹腔镜及开腹手术在直肠癌患者临床治疗中的效果观察 被引量:3

Effect of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察对比腹腔镜及开腹手术在直肠癌患者临床治疗中的效果。方法选取我院2015年3月—2018年3月收治的直肠癌患者100例为对象进行研究,利用双盲随机法将其分为观察组和对照组,各50例。采用传统开腹手术治疗对照组患者,采用腹腔镜手术治疗观察组患者。比较两组手术情况、术后输血率、止痛药使用率以及恢复情况等。结果观察组术中出血量、切口长度、手术时间、术后输血率、止痛药使用率等较对照组均显著较少,术后肠鸣音恢复、住院、下床活动等时间较对照组显著较短(P <0.05)。两组淋巴结清扫总数对比无显著差异(P> 0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术在直肠癌患者临床治疗中的效果明显优于传统开腹手术,且具有创伤小、手术时间短、术中出血量少、住院时间短、并发症少、术后恢复快等优势,具有较高安全性,值得临床应用推广。 Objective To observe and compare the effect of laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer.Methods A total of 100 patients with rectal cancer admitted in our hospital from March 2015 to March 2018 were selected as subjects.They were divided into observation group and control group by double blind random method,each groups had 50 cases.The patients in the control group were treated by traditional laparotomy,and the patients in the observation group were treated by laparoscopic surgery.The operation condition,postoperative transfusion rate,analgesic utilization rate and recovery of the two groups were compared.Results The bleeding volume,incision length,operation time,postoperative blood transfusion rate and the use rate of analgesics in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group,and the recovery time of bowel sounds,hospitalization time and ambulation time were significantly shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total number of lymph node dissection between the two groups(P >0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is superior to traditional open surgery in the clinical treatment of rectal cancer patients,and has the advantages of less trauma,shorter operation time,less intraoperative bleeding,shorter hospitalization time,fewer complications,faster postoperative recovery and so on.It is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
作者 刘小东 LIU Xiaodong(Department of General Surgery,the Ninth Hospital of Wuhan City,Hubei Province,Wuhan Hubei 430081,China)
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2019年第4期106-107,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 直肠癌 腹腔镜手术 开腹手术 临床治疗 效果 观察 rectal cancer laparoscopic surgery laparotomy clinical treatment effect observation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献121

  • 1Muhammad Shafique Sajid,Adil Ahamd,William FA Miles,Mirza Khurrum Baig.Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,2014,6(5):209-219. 被引量:8
  • 2郁宝铭,林建江,吴唯勤.微粒化纯化的黄酮成分治疗痔急性发作的多中心自身对照临床研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(12):722-724. 被引量:43
  • 3腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2006版)[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(5):462-464. 被引量:271
  • 4VEENHOF AA, VLUG MS, VAN DER PAS MH, et al. Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function aftre la- paroscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard periopera- tive care: a randomixed trial[J]. Annals of Surgery, 2012, 255(2): 216-221.
  • 5LAW WL, POON JT, FAN JK, et al. Comparison of outcome of open and laparoscopic resection for stage II and stage III rectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2009, 6(6): 1488-1493.
  • 6KEHLET H, WILMORE DW. Muhimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome[J]. Am J Surg, 2002, 183(6): 630-641.
  • 7KEHLET H, SLJM K. The future of fast-track surgery[J]. British Journal of Surgery, 2012, 99(6): 1025-1026.
  • 8KEMP JA, FINLAYSON SR. Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004 [J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(5): 1187-1187.
  • 9CAMPAGNACCI R, PATRIZI A, PIANGATELLI C, et al. A flexible concept of fast track surgery for laparoscopic colorectal resections[J]. Minerva Chir, 2010, 65(6): 609-617.
  • 10ANDERSSON J, ANGENETE E, GELLERSTEDT M, et al. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer in a randomized trial [J]. Br J Surg,2013, 100(7): 941-949.

共引文献433

同被引文献23

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部