二十世纪三四十年代马克思主义史学阵营对郭沫若史学的评论

Marxist Criticism of Guo Moruo's Historiography in the 1930s and the 1940s

20世纪三四十年代,马克思主义史学家在坚持以唯物史观为理论指导的共同研究范式下,围绕着唯物史观的理解与运用、古史分期、历史人物评价等问题,与中国马克思主义史学的重要开创者郭沫若展开了坦诚热烈的学术讨论。这场学术讨论是中国共产党组织领导的历史研究服务于现实政治革命的具体体现,也是中国马克思主义史学蓬勃生命活力的生动写照,体现了中国马克思主义史学勇于开展批评与自我批评、平等民主的学术品格,促进了中国马克思主义史学的早期发展。

In the 1930s and the 1940s,under the common research paradigm of historical materialism which provided theoretical guidance,Marxist historians carried out frank and enthusiastic academic discussions with Guo Moruo,who was an important pioneer in Chinese Marxist historiography.The discussions covered such issues as the understanding and application of historical materialism,the stages of ancient history,the evaluation of historical figures,and other issues.The academic discussions,representing the embodiment of historical research serving the political revolution,were organized and led by the CPC during the Anti-Japanese War.They were a vivid reflection of the vitality of Chinese Marxist historiography,embodying the academic characteristics of equality and democracy and the courage of Chinese Marxist historiographers to carry out criticism and self-criticism,which promoted the early development of Chinese Marxist historiography.