期刊文献+

基于质量反馈的护理干预在老年肺癌患者围术期中的应用效果 被引量:3

Application effect of nursing intervention based on quality feedback in perioperative period of elderly patients with lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究基于质量反馈的护理干预在老年肺癌患者围术期的应用效果。方法选取医院收治的老年肺癌围术期患者50例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组(n=25,常规护理)和观察组(n=25,基于质量反馈的护理干预)。比较两组患者的护理效果。结果观察组术后下床时间、排痰时间及住院时间均短于对照组(P<0.05);护理后,观察组FEV_1、MVV、FVC及FEV_1/FVC高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论基于质量反馈的护理干预在肺癌围术期老年患者的护理中效果显著,可缩短下床时间、排痰时间及住院时间,也可改善其肺功能,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To explore the application effect of nursing intervention based on quality feedback in perioperative period of elderly patients with lung cancer.Methods A total of 50 elderly patients with lung cancer during perioperative period were divided into control group(n=25,routine nursing)and observation group(n=25,nursing intervention based on quality feedback)according to random number table method.The nursing effects of two groups were compared.Results The time of getting out of bed,sputum excretion and hospitalization in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05).After nursing,the FEV1,MVV,FVC and FEV1/FVC in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Nursing intervention based on quality feedback has a significant effect in nursing of elderly patients with lung cancer during perioperative period,which can shorten the time of getting out of bed,sputum discharge and hospitalization,as well as improve patients'lung function.It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
作者 乔莉 王华 QIAO Li;WANG Hua(Oncology Department, Weinan Central Hospital, Weinan 714001;Shangluo Ttraditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Shangluo 726000, China)
出处 《临床医学研究与实践》 2019年第3期155-156,共2页 Clinical Research and Practice
关键词 质量反馈 肺癌 围术期 quality feedback lung cancer perioperative period
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献70

  • 1陈杏秀,朱妙娴.运用手术室护理质量反馈表提高手术室护理质量[J].中外医学研究,2013,11(20):119-120. 被引量:7
  • 2韩勇,王云杰,朱江,卢强.西安地区肺癌危险因素的病例对照分析[J].现代肿瘤医学,2005,13(2):267-269. 被引量:5
  • 3靳光付,胡志斌,马红霞,霍翔,陈文森,陈峰,徐耀初,沈洪兵.肿瘤家族史和吸烟在肺癌发生中的交互作用研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(12):1095-1096. 被引量:16
  • 4Light R J, Pillemer DB. Quantitative procedures. In Summing up:The Science of Reviewing Research:Harvard University Press, 1984.
  • 5Rachtan J, Sokolowski A. Risk factors for lung cancer among women in Poland. Lung Cancer, 1997,18 : 137-145.
  • 6Pohlabeln H, Jockel KH, Muller KM. The relation between various histological types of lung cancer and the number of years since cessation of smoking. Lung Cancer, 1997,18:223-229.
  • 7Matos E,Vilensky M,Boffetta P, et al. Lung cancer and smoking:a case-control study in Buenos Aires,Argentina. Lung Cancer, 1998, 21:155-163.
  • 8Jockel KH, Ahrens W, Jahn I, et al. Occupational risk factors for lung cancer:a case-control study in West Germany. Int J Epidemiol, 1998,27:549-560.
  • 9Droste JH, Weyler JJ, Van Meerbeeck JP, et al. Occupational risk factors of lung cancer: a hospital based case-control study. Occup Environ Med, 1999,56:322-327.
  • 10Agudo A,Ahrens W, Benhamou E, et al. Lung cancer and cigarette smoking in women : a multicenter case-control study in Europe. Int J Cancer,2000,88:820-827.

共引文献395

同被引文献42

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部