The Global Governance of Terrorism: An Assessment of Different Regimes

恐怖主义的全球治理:机制及其评估（英文）

Breakthroughs in the global governance of terrorism depend mainly on the development on the part of the international community of thorough and effective mechanisms.At present,global governance targets terrorism via four regimes:hegemonic governance;governance by international organizations;hybrid governance;and coordinated governance by major powers.These strategies have made a contribution to counter-terrorism,but they do have shortcomings.We start with the judgment that governance entities should adhere to the logic of consequences,the logic of appropriateness,the logic of emotion and the logic of habitus,and on this basis make a preliminary assessment of the global governance of terrorism.Present terrorism governance regimes tend to be based on the thinking of the logic of consequences with only partial implementation of the logic of appropriateness and no use,so far,of counterterrorism measures based on the logic of emotion and the logic of habitus.To address both the symptoms and root causes of terrorism,international society should encourage governance strategies that implement counter-terrorism measures based on the four types of logic above and should promote coordination and cooperation based on this platform.In this course,China could promote a more significant role in global terrorism governance for such counter-terrorism platforms as the United Nations,including the Security Council,and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

恐怖主义的全球治理能否取得突破性进展,主要取决于国际社会能否形成完备和高效的治理机制。目前,针对恐怖主义的全球治理至少存在霸权治理、国际组织治理、混合型治理、大国协调治理四种主要治理机制。上述机制为应对和打击恐怖主义做出了重要贡献,但仍存在一定不足。从治理主体需要遵循后果性逻辑、适当性逻辑、情感与积习四种行为逻辑开展恐怖主义治理活动这一判断出发,可对恐怖主义的治理机制的表现进行初步评估。目前,现有治理机制主要是基于后果性逻辑的思维反恐,只是部分落实了适当性逻辑的反恐精神,尚未系统贯彻基于情感和积习逻辑的反恐措施。如果要实现对恐怖主义的标本兼治,国际社会应该推动相关治理机制全面落实基于四种行为逻辑的治理措施,同时增进各机制平台之间的相互协调与配合。在此过程中,中国可以推动联合国、上海合作组织等反恐平台在恐怖主义全球治理过程中发挥更大的作用。