期刊文献+

刑事速裁程序的效率分析——以“成本—收益”为视角 被引量:1

Analysis of Efficiency of the Criminal Expeditious Procedure——from the Perspective of ″Csts-earnings″
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以"成本—收益"为视角,分析了刑事速裁程序在提升诉讼效率方面的优势和不足。刑事速裁程序节约了审查起诉和审判环节的时间人力物力成本,保障了犯罪嫌疑人的人身权利和基本诉讼权利;但存在着提升侦查环节的效率非常有限,量刑标准操作性不强,保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的法律帮助权、知情权不到位等不足。应采取保障好犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的诉讼权利,完善刑事速裁案件处理的标准,建立刑事速裁案件快速办理机制,原则上实行一审终审制,加快智慧法院建设等措施来提升刑事速裁程序的效率。 The criminal expeditious procedure has played a certain role in promoting the″division of complicated and simple of criminal cases″,solving the contradiction of″multiple cases and fewer people″and improving the efficiency of criminal proceedings,but it has not yet achieved the desired results.The main reason is that the efficiency of criminal expeditious procedures is relatively limited,which makes it difficult for litigating party to″jointly choose″the application of the criminal expeditious procedures.From the perspective of″costs-ownings″,this paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of criminal expeditious procedures to improve litigation efficiency,and proposes to further protect the litigant′s and defendants′litigation rights,improve the standards for handling criminal expeditious cases,establish the quick-fix mechanism for criminal expeditious cases,implement the first-instance final review system,and speed up the construction of the wisdom court,so as to improve the efficiency value of the criminal expeditious procedure to the litigating party,and give full play to the role of the criminal expeditious procedure in improving litigation efficiency.
作者 李彬 LI Bin
机构地区 中山大学法学院
出处 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第1期92-98,共7页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 刑事速裁程序 诉讼成本 诉讼收益 刑拘直诉 expeditious procedures litigation costs litigation incomes direct prosecution during criminal detention
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献36

共引文献334

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部