摘要
通过对169名留守经历大学生进行SCL-90评分,采用多因素Logistic回归分析各因子影响因素,得出结果:留守时间、留守阶段和亲子沟通频次是躯体化的危险因素;留守时间和监护方式是强迫症状的危险因素;留守时间、留守阶段、监护方式和同辈支持是人际关系敏感的危险因素;监护方式和亲子沟通频次是抑郁的危险因素等。结论:留守经历大学生SCL-90不同因子的影响因素有所不同,主要是留守时间、监护方式和亲子沟通频次,要多关注留守时间长、隔代监护而且基本没有亲子沟通的留守经历大学生。
In this study,SCL-90 score is given to 169 college students with left-behind experience,and multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of each factor.The results are:left-behind time,left-behind stage,and parent-child communication frequency are risk factors for somatization;Left-behind time and custody mode are risk factors for compulsive symptoms;Left-behind time,Left-behind stage,custody mode and peer support are risk factors for sensitive interpersonal relationship;custody mode and parent-child communication frequency are risk factors for depression.The conclusion is:influencing factors of college students with left-behind experience vary with different SCL-90 factors,mainly including left-behind time,custody mode and frequency of parent-child communication.We should pay more attention to college students with long left-behind time,grandparents'upbringing and basically no parent-child communication.
作者
陈念
Chen Nian(School of Oriental Science and Technology,Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha,410128,Hunan)
出处
《湖南工业职业技术学院学报》
2018年第6期66-69,98,共5页
Journal of Hunan Industry Polytechnic
基金
湖南省教育厅科学研究项目"儿童期留守经历对大学生心理健康的影响路径研究与干预(项目编号:2016395)"