摘要
作为学术语篇的重要特征之一,学术批评备受学者关注。本文基于陈新仁(2017a)提出的学术批评话语分析框架,及相关体裁分析模型的整合,尝试构建新的分析框架,并通过对期刊论文实例的考察,探析理论探讨型和实证研究型论文中学术批评话语特征的异同。研究发现,两类论文在学术批评的对象、维度、强度、分布位置、策略类型、面子取向等多个层面均存在显著性差异。本研究对提高学习者的学术批评意识及学术批评话语的运用能力具有一定的指导作用,为学术写作教学提供启示。
Academic criticism, one of the defining features of academic writing, has been explored by a vast number of researchers. Drawing on the analytical framework of academic criticism discourse proposed by Chen(2017a) and related models in genre analysis, this study attempts to develop a revised framework. By contrasting academic criticism discourse in research articles featuring different paradigms, namely theoretical research and empirical research, the study finds that the targets, dimensions, intensities, locations, strategies, face orientations of academic criticism discourse in theoretical research articles are significantly different from those in empirical research articles. These findings have implications for teaching academic writing.
作者
李梦欣
LI Mengxin(School of Foreign Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China;School of Foreign Studies, Jiangsu Second Normal University, Nanjing 210013, China)
出处
《浙江外国语学院学报》
2018年第6期33-41,103,共10页
Journal of Zhejiang International Studies University
关键词
学术批评
分析框架
学术写作
对比研究
academic criticism
analytical framework
academic writing
contrastive study
