期刊文献+

道德解脱与归因:企业非伦理行为面前员工为何保持沉默? 被引量:4

Ethical Relief and Attribution:Why do employees remain silent in the face of enterprise non-ethical behavior?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 面对企业非伦理行为,员工有时候为何选择沉默,这是近年来学者比较关注的问题。文章聚焦于自利型伦理氛围这一特定情境,采用跨层次研究方法,探索道德解脱在不同归因情况下对员工沉默的影响。研究发现,面对企业的非伦理问题,道德解脱(归己因)在自利型伦理氛围与员工沉默之间起到完全中介作用。道德解脱(归他因)在自利型伦理氛围与员工沉默之间起到部分中介作用。权力距离在道德解脱与员工沉默之间起到负向调节作用。研究表明,员工面对企业的非伦理问题是否选择沉默,主要取决于企业的自利型伦理氛围和个体道德解脱的意义建构。文章对于揭示企业非伦理行为下员工沉默选择问题具有理论和现实价值。 In the face of enterprise non-ethical behavior,the reason for employees silent tolerance is receiving increasing attention in recent years.Focusing on the specific situation of self-interest ethical climate,using a cross-level approach,this article explores the effects of ethical relief on employees silent tolerance under different attribution situations.The research finds that the ethical relief (attribution) plays a completely mediating role between self-interest ethic atmosphere and employees silence in the face of enterprise non-ethical issues.Moral disengagement plays a mediating role between self-interest ethics and employee silence.The power distance plays a negative role between ethical relief and employee silence.The research shows the reason for employees choice of silent tolerance in the face of non-ethical problems depends on the self-interest ethical atmosphere of the enterprise and the meaning construction of individual ethical relief.This paper is of theoretical and practical value in revealing the problem of employees choice of silence under the enterprise non-ethical behavior.
作者 蔡双立 高阳 CAI Shuang-li;GAO Yang(Tianjin University of Finance and Economics,Tianjin 300222,China)
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第2期30-40,共11页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目资助项目"中小企业网络化成长中的关系冲突与进化问题研究"(15AGL009)
关键词 自利型伦理氛围 道德解脱 权力距离 员工沉默 self-interested ethical climate moral relief power distance employee silence
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献117

  • 1陆昌勤,凌文辁,方俐洛.管理自我效能感与一般自我效能感的关系[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):586-592. 被引量:84
  • 2吴红梅.西方组织伦理氛围研究探析[J].外国经济与管理,2005,27(9):32-38. 被引量:31
  • 3黄任之,姚树桥,邹涛.个人主义和集体主义量表中文版信度和效度的研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(6):564-565. 被引量:16
  • 4沈选伟,孙立志.组织沉默的文化根源[J].郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版),2007,26(3):94-95. 被引量:23
  • 5Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall, 1986.
  • 6Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the preparation of inhumanities. Personal and Social Psychology Review, 1999,3 : 193-209.
  • 7Bandura A,Barbaranelli C,Caprara GV,et al. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1996,71 364-374.
  • 8Bandura A, Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, et al. Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001, 80:125-135.
  • 9Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara GV,et al. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996,71 (2): 364-374.
  • 10Bandura A,Barbaranelli C,Caprara GV ,et al. Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 1996,67(3) : 1206-1222.

共引文献207

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部