数字人文背景下古典目录学“辨考”思想的实现路径初探

Probe on the Realization Path of the Bian Kao Thought of Chinese Classical Bibliography under the Background of Digital Humanities

古典目录学“辨章学术、考镜源流”的传统对于满足人文历史研究的需要仍具有现实价值,而利用数字人文技术实现古典目录学“辨考”思想,重点要完成对学者和图书源流的考察。首先,利用“中国历代人物传记数据库”(CBDB)、QGIS、Gephi等数据库和软件,考察苏轼的社会关系网络和任职地,并将结果可视化呈现;其次,利用SQLite数据库完成对《直斋书录解题》《郡斋读书志》《明史·艺文志》数字资源的存储,用Python设计了一个用以查询和对比三种书目类名及图书著录信息的工具,并利用桑基图考察和分析了《直斋书录解题》和《郡斋读书志》中“易”学图书所属类名及著录情况发生变化的原因。本研究为实现古典目录学优良传统与现代信息技术的融合作了有益的尝试。

The tradition of“distinguishing the academic chapter,examining the mirror source and course”in chinese classical bibliography is still of practical value in meeting the needs of humanities research.In order to realize the thought with digital technologies,we should make a deep investigation on historical scholars and the origin of books.First,the paper selected Su Shi as an example and output his data from CBDB,including the data of his academic relationship network and geographic information of his official positions,which are visualized by QGIS and Gephi.Then,the paper extracted the category and entry from three bibliographies of Jun Zhai Du Shu Zhi,Zhi Zhai Shu Lu Jie Ti and Ming Shi Yi Wen Zhi,and stored them into a SQLite database.Authors use Python to develop a user interface in which users can execute queries for data from the database,and show the details by Sankey diagram,based on which books of Yi catalogued in Jun Zhai Du Shu Zhi and Zhi Zhai Shu Lu Jie Ti are analyzed.This study has made a useful exploration for the integration of fine traditions of classical bibliography and information technologies.