期刊文献+

高冲突性证据的软件可信性评估方法 被引量:1

Software Trustworthy Evaluation for High-conflict Evidence Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决传统基于DS理论的融合算法在处理高冲突证据时,存在将所有证据都视为高冲突证据统一进行修正的问题,提出一种处理证据高冲突性的改进算法。判断证据的冲突程度,只对冲突性较大的证据进行修正,在保证原始证据真实性的基础上对高冲突证据源进行修正,用DS合成法则进行融合,并通过实验验证。实验结果表明:该算法具有良好的收敛性和可行性,与其他算法相比,可在一定程度上提高合成过程中证据的可靠性。 In order to solve the problem that the traditional fusion algorithm based on DS theory treats all the evidences as high conflict evidences in the process of handling them,this paper proposes an improved algorithm to deal with the high conflict of evidences.We judge the conflicting degrees of evidences firstly,then correcting the high conflict of evidences to reduce them based on the authenticity of original evidences and using DS synthesis rule to fuse the evidences,and then verifying the rationality through the experiment.The results of experiment show that the algorithm we proposed has good convergence and feasibility.Compared with other algorithms,the proposed algorithm can improve the reliability of evidence to some extent in the synthesis process.
作者 陈倩倩 许丽星 龚彬 Chen Qianqian;Xu Lixing;Gong Bin(Institute of Electronic Engineering,China Academy of Engineering Physics,Mianyang 621999,China)
出处 《兵工自动化》 2019年第2期55-59,共5页 Ordnance Industry Automation
基金 中物院十三五重大预研项目(TA060607)
关键词 可信软件 评估方法 高冲突证据 证据理论 trustworthy software evaluation method high-conflict evidence evidential theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献65

  • 1史会增,缪旭东.浅析军用软件可靠性[J].舰船电子工程,2005,25(3):26-28. 被引量:6
  • 2詹辉,张其才.提高铸铁材质的重大技术突破——记合肥工业大学、合肥工大双发信息系统技术有限公司“铸铁材质参数液态在线智能检测和质量控制系统”项目团队[J].中国科技奖励,2007(3):38-40. 被引量:3
  • 3Rawashdeh A,Matalkah B.A new software quality model for evaluating COTS components[J].Journal of Computer Science,2006.2(4):373-381.
  • 4High Confidence Software and Systems Coordinating Group.High Confidence Software and Systems Research Needs[R].2001-01-10[2008-09-24].http://www.ccic.gov/pubs/hcss-research.pdf.
  • 5Hasselbring W,Reussner R.Toward trustworthy software systems[J].IEEE Computer,2006,39(4):91-92.
  • 6Voas Jeffrey.Trusted software's holy grail.Software Quality Journal,2003,11(1):9-17.
  • 7Hua Z S,Gong B G,Xu X Y.A DS-AHP approach for multi-attribute decision making problem with incomplete information[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2008,34(3):2221-2227.
  • 8Jung H W,Rim S G,Chung C S.Measuring software product quality:A survey of ISO/IEC 9126[J].IEEE Software,2004,21(5):88-92.
  • 9Yang J B,Wang Y M,Xu D L,et al.The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,171(1):309-343.
  • 10Yang J B.Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001.131(1):31-61.

共引文献86

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部