论胡塞尔自然主义批判与其早期先验现象学之间的关系

On the Relationship Between Husserl's Critique of Naturalism and His Early Transcendental Phenomenology

在《逻辑研究》中,胡塞尔还没达到先验现象学领域,也没能提出"自然主义批判";但当《现象学的观念》基本完成了向先验现象学的突破时,"自然主义批判"就清楚明确地呈现出来。而在《哲学作为严格的科学》中,先验现象学进一步发展并走向具体化,"自然主义批判"也同时发展并变得更加具体。当先验现象学在"观念Ⅰ"中走向成熟化和系统化时,"自然主义批判"也随之变得更加成熟、深入、积极和彻底。胡塞尔"自然主义批判"与其早期先验现象学之间的这种同步性、协调一致性之关系,具有重要的辩证内涵和哲学启示。

In Logic Investigation,Husserl had not reached the field of transcendental phenomenology,nor put forward the critique of naturalism;however,when The Idea of Phenomenology had basically completed the breakthrough to the transcendental phenomenology,the critique of naturalism was clearly presented;in Philosophy as Rigorous Science,the transcendental phenomenology had been further developed and concreted,and the critique of naturalism had also developed and became more specific;when the transcendental phenomenology was matured and systematized in the“IdeaⅠ”,the critique of naturalism had also been more matured,deeper,positive and thorough.The relationship between Husserl's critique of naturalism and his early transcendental phenomenology was of synchronism and consistency,which had important dialectical connotation and philosophical revelation.