期刊文献+

无保护分娩技术与会阴侧切术对产妇及新生儿的影响 被引量:2

Effect of unprotected delivery technique and lateral episiotomy on pregnant women and newborns
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨无保护分娩技术与会阴侧切术对产妇及新生儿的影响。方法选择2017年1月至12月于本院分娩的初产妇126例作为研究对象,依据分娩方式的不同分为对照组和观察组,对照组60例接受会阴侧切术,观察组66例接受无保护分娩技术。观察两组会阴裂伤程度、产后疼痛程度、产程时间、产后出血量、缝合时间、产后性生活质量及新生儿窒息情况等。结果观察组缝合时间少于对照组,视觉模拟评分(VAS)低于对照组,女性性功能指数(FSFI)评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组产程时间(第一、第二)、产后出血量、Apgar评分对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组会阴Ⅰ度、Ⅱ度裂伤发生率高于对照组,Ⅲ度裂伤发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论无保护分娩技术有助于降低产妇产后疼痛及会阴裂伤程度,促进产后性生活质量的恢复,不增加产后出血量、新生儿窒息率及产程时间。 Objective To investigate the effect of unprotected delivery technique and lateral episiotomy on pregnant women and newborns.Methods A total of 126 primiparas from January 2017 to December 2017 were selected and divided into two groups according to delivery modes.A total of 60 pregnant women with lateral episiotomy were taken as the control group,and 66 pregnant women with unprotected delivery technique were taken as the observation group.The degree of perineal laceration,postpartum pain degree,birth process time,postpartum bleeding volume,suture time,postpartum sexual life quality,neonatal asphyxia were compared between the two groups.Results The suture time of observation group was less than control group,the visual analogue scale(VAS)in observation group was lower than control group,the female sexual function index(FSFI)in observation group was higher than control group(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in the birth process time(first and second),postpartum bleeding volume,Apgar score between the two groups(P>0.05).The rate of degreeⅠandⅡperineal laceration in observation group were higher than control group,the rate of degreeⅢperineal laceration in observation group was lower than control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Unprotected delivery technique for pregnant women can decrease postpartum pain and perineal laceration,promote recovery of postpartum sexual life quality,and not increase postpartum bleeding volume,neonatal asphyxia rate and birth process time.
作者 田玲 陈甜 孙月荣 TIAN Ling;CHEN Tian;SUN Yue-rong(Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,The Maternal and Child Care Service Centre of Zhumadian City,Zhumadian,Henan 463000,China)
出处 《青岛医药卫生》 2019年第1期18-21,共4页 Qingdao Medical Journal
关键词 产妇 无保护分娩技术 会阴侧切术 新生儿窒息 会阴裂伤 疼痛程度 Pregnant women Unprotected delivery technique Lateral episiotomy Neonatal asphyxia Perineal laceration Pain degree
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献119

  • 1吴氢凯,张荣,程慧,冯洁,应涛,李勤,罗来敏,惠宁.盆底三维超声观察不同分娩方式对初产女性盆膈裂孔的影响[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(5):615-619. 被引量:29
  • 2张睿,罗来敏,应涛,冯亮.正常阴道分娩及选择性剖宫产对女性下尿路解剖和控尿功能的影响[J].上海医学,2005,28(3):205-208. 被引量:15
  • 3谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119.
  • 4乐杰.妇产科学[M].第8版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.97-106.
  • 5Berghella V,Baxter JK,Chauhan SP,et al. Evidence-based labor and delivery management[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2008,199 (5) :445-454.
  • 6McKinnie V,Swift SE ,Wang W. The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005,193:512-517.
  • 7Frankman EA,Wang L,Bunker CH,et al. Episiotomy in the United States:has anything changed? [J]. Am J Obstet Gyneeol, 2009,200 (5) : 5731-5737.
  • 8McCandlish R,Bowler U,van Asten H,et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour[J].Brit J Obstet Gynaec,1998,105(12) : 1262-1272.
  • 9Foroughipour A,Firuzeh F,Ghahiri A. The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome[J].J Res Med Sci,2011,16(8): 1040-1046.
  • 10Rozita R,Sussan S,Chan YH,et al. A Comparison of the "Hands-Off'and "Hands-On"Methods to Reduce Perineal Lacerations :A Randomised Clinical Trial[J]. J Obstet and Gyneco India, 2014,64 ( 6 ) : 425 -429.

共引文献298

同被引文献36

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部