“当代文学史”的余华书写——以洪子诚、陈思和为例

Writing YU Hua in the History of Contemporary Literature:Taking the Books of HONG Zicheng and CHEN Sihe as Examples

余华的富有争议性是"当代文学史"书写中的一个挑战。洪子诚和陈思和著的余华书写是两种代表性的"历史化"方式。从"一体化"到"多元化"的文学史观与从"共名"到"无名"的文学史观,是洪子诚与陈思和书写余华的最终依据。前者去繁就简和搁置个性的价值中立,非乐观、非进化论的价值倾向,体现为对余华一定的意义抑制;后者强力性文化阐释和个性化、学术化倾向,乐观的、进化论的价值取向,则体现出对余华过度的意义阐扬。二著的差异,表明了当代文学史难以对余华作文学史的还原。

Writing YU Hua in the history of contemporary literature was very controversial.HONG Zicheng and CHEN Sihe used two different typical“historization”methods to write him in their books.The final bases of them were the total and multiple viewpoints of the history of literature.The former always ignored the personality of writers,used the non-optimistic and non-evolutionary value tendency,suspended the interpretation of meaning for YU Hua;however,the later usually showed the personality of writers,insisted on the optimistic and evolutionary value tendency,stressed the meaning of YU Hua continuously.The difference between HONG Zicheng and CHEN Sihe reveals that it is very difficult to reduce YU Hua in the history of contemporary literature.