期刊文献+

抗生素降阶梯疗法对重症肺炎患者的临床疗效评价 被引量:10

Evaluation on the Clinical Efficacy of Antibiotic Deescalation Therapy in Patients With Severe Pneumonia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨抗生素降阶梯疗法对重症肺炎患者的临床疗效。方法收集我院重症肺炎患者,分为:研究组(30例,接受抗生素降阶梯疗法)和对照组(30例,接受常规抗生素治疗)。对比两组治疗前后72小时白细胞值及CRP;两组临床症状改善时间;两组重症肺炎有效率;两组用药期间药物不良反应分析。结果研究组和对照组治疗前白细胞值及CRP分别为[(18.68±2.47)×109/L、(28.82±3.35)mg/L]、[(18.54±2.69)×109/L、(29.01±3.16)mg/L)],比较差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05);研究组和对照组治疗后72小时白细胞值及CRP分别为[(10.28±2.69)×109/L、(6.34±2.12)mg/L]、[(15.26±3.47)×109/L、(10.34±2.58)mg/L],比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);两组临床症状改善时间(体温恢复正常时间、呼吸平稳时间、啰音消失时间、病情稳定时间)比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组和对照组重症肺炎有效率分别为100.00%、83.33%,比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论相对于常规抗菌药物服用,抗生素降阶梯疗法疗效更优,具体体现在炎症控制程度、肺部症状改善方面。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of antibiotics deescalation therapy for severe pneumonia.Methods The patients with severe pneumonia in our hospital were divided into study group(30 cases,receiving antibiotic staircase therapy)and control group(30 cases,receiving routine antibiotic treatment).White blood cell and CRP in 72 hours before and after treatment;improvement time of clinical symptoms;effective rate of severe pneumonia;adverse drug reactions in the two groups during medication were compared.Results Before treatment,the leukocyte count and CRP in the study group and the control group were [(18.68 ± 2.47)×10^9/L,(28.82 ± 3.35)mg/L],[(18.54 ± 2.69)×10^9/L,(29.01 ± 3.16)mg/L)],respectively,there was no significant difference(P>0.05).Leukocyte count and CRP at 72 hours after treatment in the study group and the control group were [(10.28 ± 2.69)×10^9/L,(6.34 ± 2.12)mg/L],[(15.26 ± 3.47)×10^9/L,(10.34 ± 2.58)mg/L],respectively,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There were significant differences in the improvement time of clinical symptoms between the two groups(time of body temperature returning to normal,time of breathing stabilization,time of rale disappearance,time of disease stabilization)(P<0.05).The effective rates of severe pneumonia in the study group and the control group were 100.00% and 83.33%,respectively,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with conventional antibiotics,the efficacy of de escalation therapy is better,especially in the degree of inflammation control and improvement of pulmonary symptoms.
作者 贾薇 JIA Wei(Department of Infectious Diseases,Weihai Municipal Hospital,Weihai Shandong 264200,China)
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2019年第3期48-50,共3页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 抗生素 降阶梯 疗法 重症 肺炎 疗效 antibiotics deescalation therapy severe pneumonia curative effect
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献82

  • 1李敬文.抗生素降阶梯治疗小儿重症肺炎的临床效果分析[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(7):145-146. 被引量:6
  • 2沈敏,王玉,许文兵,曾学军,张奉春.系统性红斑狼疮肺部受累的临床表现[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(48):3392-3395. 被引量:19
  • 3社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(10):651-655. 被引量:3050
  • 4中华医学会重症医学分会.呼吸机相关性肺炎预防、诊断和治疗指南(2013)[J].中华内科杂志,2013,52(6):1.
  • 5Theuretzbacher U.Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues for antimicrobial therapy in patients with cancer[J].CID,2012,54(12):1785-1792.
  • 6陈勇川.PK/PD原理在多重耐药菌感染治疗中的应用[J].中国临床药学学术年会暨第九届临床药师论坛论文集,南昌,2013.中国医院协会药事管理专业委员会,2013.
  • 7Roberts JA,Abdul-Aziz MH,Lipman J,et al.Individualised antibiotic dosing for patients who are critically ill:challenges and potential solutions[J].Lancet Infect Dis,2014,14 (6):498-509.
  • 8Goulenok T,Fantin B.Antimicrobial treatment of febrile neutropenia:pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations[J].Clin Pharmacokinet,2013,52(10):869-883.
  • 9Zavascki AP,Bulitta JB,Landersdorfer CB.Combination therapy for carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacteria[J].Anti Infect Ther,2013,11 (12):1333-1353.
  • 10Falagas ME,Rafailidis PI,Ioannidou E,et al.Colistin therapy for microbiologically documented multidrug-resistant Gramnegative bacterial infections:a retrospective cohort study of 258patients[J].Int J Antimicrob Agents,2010,35 (2):194-199.

共引文献64

同被引文献85

引证文献10

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部