期刊文献+

Relationships among KRAS mutation status, expression of RAS pathway signaling molecules, and clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer 被引量:3

Relationships among KRAS mutation status, expression of RAS pathway signaling molecules, and clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3 K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways all belong to mitogen-activated protein kinase(MAPK) signaling pathways, Mutations in any one of the upstream genes(such as the RAS gene or the BRAF gene) may be transmitted to the protein through transcription or translation, resulting in abnormal activation of the signaling pathway. This study investigated the relationship between the KRAS gene mutation and the clinicopathological features and prognosis of colorectal cancer(CRC), and the effect of KRAS mutations on its associated proteins in CRC, with an aim to clarify the cause of tumor progression and drug resistance caused by mutation of the KRAS gene.AIM To investigate the KRAS gene and RAS pathway signaling molecules in CRC and to analyze their relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis METHODS Colorectal cancer tissue specimens from 196 patients were analyzed for KRAS mutations using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and for KRAS, BRAF,MEK, and ERK protein expression levels using immunohistochemistry of tumor microarrays. To analyze differences of RAS pathway signaling molecule expression levels in different KRAS gene status, the relationships between these parameters and clinicopathological features, 4-year progression-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed by independent sample t test, Kaplan-Meier plots,and the log-rank test. Predictors of overall and disease-free survival were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model.RESULTS Of the 196 patients, 62(32%) carried mutations in codon 12(53/62) or codon 13(9/62) in exon 2 of the KRAS gene. KRAS, BRAF, ERK, and MEK protein expression was detected in 71.4%, 78.8%, 64.3%, and 50.8% of CRC tissues,respectively. There were no significant differences between KRAS mutation status and KRAS, BRAF, MEK, or ERK protein levels. Positive expression of KRAS and ERK was associated with poor tumor differentiation, and KRAS expression was also associated with age < 56 years. MEK expression was significantly associated with distant metastasis(P < 0.05). The 4-year progression-free survival rate, but not overall survival rate, was significantly higher in patients with KRAS-negative tumors than in those with KRAS-positive tumors(P < 0.05), whereas BRAF, MEK,and ERK expression was unrelated to survival. Multivariate analysis showed that only the expression of KRAS protein was a risk factor for tumor recurrence(P <0.05). No other clinicopathological factors correlated with KRAS, BRAF, MEK, or ERK expression.CONCLUSION KRAS gene mutations do not affect downstream protein expression in CRC.KRAS protein is associated with poor tumor differentiation, older age, and a risk of tumor recurrence. BACKGROUND The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3 K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways all belong to mitogen-activated protein kinase(MAPK) signaling pathways, Mutations in any one of the upstream genes(such as the RAS gene or the BRAF gene) may be transmitted to the protein through transcription or translation, resulting in abnormal activation of the signaling pathway. This study investigated the relationship between the KRAS gene mutation and the clinicopathological features and prognosis of colorectal cancer(CRC), and the effect of KRAS mutations on its associated proteins in CRC, with an aim to clarify the cause of tumor progression and drug resistance caused by mutation of the KRAS gene.AIM To investigate the KRAS gene and RAS pathway signaling molecules in CRC and to analyze their relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis METHODS Colorectal cancer tissue specimens from 196 patients were analyzed for KRAS mutations using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and for KRAS, BRAF,MEK, and ERK protein expression levels using immunohistochemistry of tumor microarrays. To analyze differences of RAS pathway signaling molecule expression levels in different KRAS gene status, the relationships between these parameters and clinicopathological features, 4-year progression-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed by independent sample t test, Kaplan-Meier plots,and the log-rank test. Predictors of overall and disease-free survival were assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model.RESULTS Of the 196 patients, 62(32%) carried mutations in codon 12(53/62) or codon 13(9/62) in exon 2 of the KRAS gene. KRAS, BRAF, ERK, and MEK protein expression was detected in 71.4%, 78.8%, 64.3%, and 50.8% of CRC tissues,respectively. There were no significant differences between KRAS mutation status and KRAS, BRAF, MEK, or ERK protein levels. Positive expression of KRAS and ERK was associated with poor tumor differentiation, and KRAS expression was also associated with age < 56 years. MEK expression was significantly associated with distant metastasis(P < 0.05). The 4-year progression-free survival rate, but not overall survival rate, was significantly higher in patients with KRAS-negative tumors than in those with KRAS-positive tumors(P < 0.05), whereas BRAF, MEK,and ERK expression was unrelated to survival. Multivariate analysis showed that only the expression of KRAS protein was a risk factor for tumor recurrence(P <0.05). No other clinicopathological factors correlated with KRAS, BRAF, MEK, or ERK expression.CONCLUSION KRAS gene mutations do not affect downstream protein expression in CRC.KRAS protein is associated with poor tumor differentiation, older age, and a risk of tumor recurrence.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2019年第7期808-823,共16页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by the Henan Department of Science and Technology,China,No.162102310317
关键词 COLORECTAL cancer KRAS gene KRAS PROTEIN BRAF PROTEIN MEK PROTEIN ERK PROTEIN Colorectal cancer KRAS gene KRAS protein BRAF protein MEK protein ERK protein
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1郑树.我国的结直肠癌筛查方案[J].医学研究杂志,2006,35(2):8-9. 被引量:13
  • 2Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer Statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin, 2008,58(2) :71-96.
  • 3Ciardiello F, Tortora G. EGFR Antagonists in Cancer Treatment. N Engl J Med, 2008,358(11):1160-1174.
  • 4Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004,351 (4) : 337-345.
  • 5Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2009,27 ( 5 ) : 663 -671.
  • 6Van Cutsem E, Kohme CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med, 2009,360(14) : 1408-1417.
  • 7Jhawer M, Goel S, Wilson AJ, et al. PIK3CA mutation/PTEN expression status predicts response of colon cancer cells to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab. Cancer Res, 2008,68(6):1953-1961.
  • 8Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common Toxicity Crieria (CTC) version 2.0. Bethesda, (MD) : National Cancer Institute (US). 1999. http://etep.cancer.gov/reporting/ctc.html.
  • 9Saltz LB, Meropol NJ, Loehrer PJ Sr, et al. Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with refractory colorectal cancer that expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Clin Oncol, 2004,22(7) : 1201-1208.
  • 10Lenz HJ, Van Cutsem E, Khambata-Ford S, et al. Multicenter phase II and translational study of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal carcinoma refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines. J Clin Oncol, 2006,24(30):4914-4921.

共引文献1

同被引文献7

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部