期刊文献+

无创助产护理技术在减轻产妇疼痛中的应用

Application of Non-Invasive Midwifery Nursing Technology in Reducing Maternal Pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察无创助产护理技术在减轻产妇疼痛中的应用效果。方法选择我院2016年7月至2018年7月期间收治的产妇14 500例,随机分为观察组和对照组各7 250例。对照组产妇分娩期间接受传统助产护理,观察组产妇分娩期间接受无创助产护理,比较两组产妇的会阴水肿发生率、疼痛评分以及疼痛持续时间。结果观察组产妇的会阴水肿发生率为2.07%,显著低于对照组产妇的5.79%,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。观察组产妇的疼痛评分为(2.07±1.13)分,显著低于对照组产妇的(6.59±3.03)分,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。观察组产妇的疼痛持续时间为(6.58±1.18) h,显著短于对照组产妇的(14.35±3.49) h,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论在分娩期间对产妇行无创助产护理,可以减少产妇会阴水肿的发生率,降低产妇的分娩疼痛感,促使产妇早期恢复。 Objective To observe the application effect of non-invasive midwifery nursing technology in reducing maternal pain. Methods A total of 14 500 cases of puerperas in our hospital from July 2016 to July 2018 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, with 7 250 cases in each group. The control group received traditional midwifery nursing during delivery, and the observation group received non-invasive midwifery nursing during delivery. The incidence of perineal edema, pain score and duration of pain were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of perineal edema of the observation group was 2.07%, significantly lower than 5.79% of the control group (P <0.05). The pain score of the observation group was (2.07 ±1.13) points, significantly lower than (6.59 ±3.03) points of the control group (P <0.05). The duration of pain of the observation group was (6.58 ±1.18) h, significantly shorter than (14.35 ±3.49) h of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusions Non-invasive midwifery nursing applied during delivery can reduce the incidence of maternal perineal edema, reduce the maternal pain degree of delivery, and promote the early recovery of puerperas.
作者 黄丽娟 HUANG Lijuan(Huizhou Maternal and Child Healthcare and Family Planning Service Center, Huizhou 516001, China)
出处 《临床医学工程》 2019年第2期241-242,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 无创助产护理技术 产妇 分娩疼痛 Non-invasive midwifery nursing technology Puerperas Delivery pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1张泽兰.产妇分娩期疼痛的心理干预[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2006,12(04B):692-692. 被引量:25
  • 2潘传德.新时期我国社区护理发展的SWOT分析[J].护理研究(上旬版),2006,20(11):2821-2822. 被引量:25
  • 3Sharon N,Bilenko N,Mazor M,et al.The impact d changing the approach of pedorming episiotomy on perineal trauma in primiparous:a comparison between two periods with different episiotomy rates[J].Harefuah,2011,150 (11):824-828;2011,150(11):877.
  • 4Aasheim V,Nilsen AB,Lukasse M,et al.Perineal techniques during the see- ond stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma[J].Coehrane Database Syst Rev,2011(12):CD006672.
  • 5Foroughipour A, Firuzeh F,Ghahiri A, et al. The effect of peri- neal control with hands- on and hand- poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome[J]. J Res Med Sci, 2011, 16 (8):1040-1046.
  • 6Aasheim V, Nilsen AB, Lukasse M, et al. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2011,7(12) :66.
  • 7Adriana de Souza Caroci da Costa, Gonzalez Riesco ML. A comparison of " hands off" versus" hands on" techniques for decreasing perineal lacerations during birth [J]. J Midwifery Womens Health,2006,51(2) : 106.
  • 8Sharon N,Bilenko N, Mazor M, et al. The impact of changing the approach of performing episiotomy on perineal trauma in primiparous: a comparison between two periods with different episiotomy rates [J]. Harefuah,2011,150(11) :824-877.
  • 9Walker C, Rodriguez T, Herranz A, et al. Alternative model of birth to reduce the risk of assisted vaginal delivery and perineal trauma[J]. Int Urogynecol J,2012,23(9) : 1249-1256.
  • 10Aasheim V, Nilsen AB, Lukasse M, et al. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011,7 (12) : 66.

共引文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部