期刊文献+

论我国反垄断调查信息公开制度的立法完善 被引量:1

On Legislative Improvement of Information Disclosure System in Anti-Monopoly Investigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现行《反垄断法》就反垄断调查的信息公开所作的规定不仅在内容上十分单薄,而且在性质上只是授权性条款。这使得我国反垄断调查的透明性非常低,已经给我国反垄断执法的廉洁性、科学性、权威性、教育性带来了不可忽视的负面影响。除了秘密举报的举报人信息、被调查对象的商业秘密、影响到国家安全的信息以外,立法应当明确要求反垄断执法机构必须向社会公布调查启动阶段的立案信息、调查过程阶段的适用经营者承诺制度信息、调查结束阶段的结论信息,这些信息的公开应当采取集中方式进行。 The articles about information disclosure during investigations in Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China in effect are simple and enabling clauses in nature. It makes the investigations lack of transparency and has negatively affected the integrity, scientificity, authority and guidance of antitrust enforcement. Except for the information of secret informants, business secrets and national security, it's necessary to modify the investigation procedures, which include clearly that the anti-monopoly enforcement agency shall be responsible for information disclosure to the public about fi le information in initial investigations, information of promises when investigating and conclusions, all of which should be released on the same system.
作者 丁茂中
出处 《电子知识产权》 CSSCI 2019年第2期31-40,共10页 Electronics Intellectual Property
关键词 反垄断调查 信息公开 执法透明性 制度保障 Anti-Monopoly Investigation Information Disclosure Transparency of Enforcement System Guarantee
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献50

  • 1苏力.解释的难题:对几种法律文本解释方法的追问[J].中国社会科学,1997(4):11-32. 被引量:285
  • 2郑永流.出释入造——法律诠释学及其与法律解释学的关系[J].法学研究,2002,24(3):21-36. 被引量:110
  • 3Richard A. Epstein, Antitrust Consent Decrees in Theory and Practice. Why Less Is More, The AEI Press (2007), p. 1.
  • 4See George Stephanov Georgiev, Contagious Efficiency. The Growing Reliance on U. S. --Style Antitrust Settlements in EU Law, 2007 Utah L. Rev. 971, p. 999.
  • 5Philippe Chon6, Said Souam, Arnold Vialfont, Commitments in Antitrust, p. 3, http.//WWW, chaire--eppp, org/files_chaire/Com- mitments in Antitrust. pdf, 2012-11 22.
  • 6See Milton Katz, The Consent Decree in Antitrust Administration, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 3 (Jan. , 1940), pp. 423 426.
  • 7Wouter P.J. Wils, The Use of Settlements in Public Antitrust Enforcement Objectives and Principle, p. 6, p. 13, http.//ssrn. com/abstract= 1135627, 2012-11-22.
  • 8See MEMO/04/217, Brussels, 17. September 2004.
  • 9[日]根岸哲,舟田正之.《日本禁止垄断法概论》第3版,王为农,陈杰译,中国法制出版社2007年版,第517页.
  • 10See John Temple Lang, Commitmenl Decisions under Regulation 1/2003. Legal Aspects of a New Kind of Competition Decision, E.C.L.R. 2003, 24(8), p. 351, p. 348, p. 347.

共引文献92

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部