期刊文献+

替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷对急性心肌梗死行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的疗效对比 被引量:7

Comparison of Efficacy of Tiglilo and Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比给予急性心肌梗死(AMI)溶栓及择期行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者应用替格瑞洛及氯吡格雷的效果。方法将74例AMI患者随机分成观察组(37例)与对照组(37例),两组均行溶栓及择期PCI治疗,在治疗基础上,给予观察组患者加用替格瑞洛治疗,给予对照组患者氯吡格雷治疗,观察两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组治疗后血小板计数高于治疗前及对照组治疗后,血小板最大聚集率及肌酐均低于治疗前及对照组治疗后,差异均具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论同氯吡格雷相比,应用替格瑞洛可有效抑制AMI患者PCI治疗后血小板聚集。 Objective To compare the effects of tiglilo and clopidogrel on patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI)and selective percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods 74 patients with AMI were randomly divided into observation group(37 cases)and control group(37 cases).Thrombolysis and selective PCI were performed in both groups.On the basis of treatment,the patients in the observation group were treated with tegrilol.The patients in the control group were treated with clopidogrel.The therapeutic effect of the two groups was observed.Results After treatment,the platelet count in the observation group was higher than that before treatment and after treatment in the control group.The maximum platelet aggregation rate and creatinine in the observation group were lower than that before treatment and after treatment in the control group.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with clopidogrel,tigrel can effectively inhibit platelet aggregation in patients with AMI after PCI.
作者 徐炯 XU Jiong(Department of Cardiology,Baicheng Central Hospital,Baicheng Jilin 137000,China)
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2019年第4期94-96,共3页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 替格瑞洛 氯吡格雷 急性心肌梗死 经皮冠状动脉 介入治疗 tigrillo clopidogrel acute myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary artery interventional therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献88

  • 1徐亚伟,李宪凯.不断更新的抗栓治疗——2012年ACCF/AHA不稳定性心绞痛和非ST段抬高性心肌梗死指南解读[J].中国循环杂志,2012,27(S01):12-15. 被引量:16
  • 2郑心田,李广平.1961例急性心肌梗死发病年龄和性别分布分析[J].临床心血管病杂志,2007,23(4):312-313. 被引量:17
  • 3柯元南,陈纪林.不稳定性心绞痛和非ST段抬高心肌梗死诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(4):295-304. 被引量:2143
  • 4Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med, 2009,361 : 1045-1057.
  • 5Cannon CP, Harrington RA, James S, et al. Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel inpatients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO):a Randomised double blind study. Lancet,2010,375:283-293.
  • 6Storey RF. Pharmacology and clinical trials of reversibly-binding P2Y12 inhibitors. Thromb Haemost, 2011,105 : S75-81.
  • 7Cannon CP, Husted S, Harrington RA, et al. Safety, tolerability,and initial efficacy of AZD6140, the first reversible oraladenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, compared with clopidogrel, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: primary results of the DISPERSE-2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:1844-1851.
  • 8Montalescot G, Lassen JF, Hamm CW, et al. Ambulance or in- catheterization laboratory administration of ticagrelor for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myo- cardial infarction : rationale and design of the randomized, double- blind Administration of Ticagrelor in the cath Lab or in the Am- bulance for New ST elevation myocardial Infarction to open the Coronary artery (ATLANTIC) study[ J]. Am Heart J,2013,165 (4) :515-522.
  • 9Cattaneo M. Resistance to anti-platelet agents [ J ]. Thromb Res, 2011,127(Suppl 3) :S61-63.
  • 10Lotrionte M, Bondi-Zoecai GG, Agostoni P, et al Meta-analysis appraising high elopidogrel loading in patients undergoing percu-taneous coronary intervention [ J ]. Am J C ardiol, 2007,100 (8) : 1199-1206.

同被引文献51

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部