期刊文献+

泌尿外科采用BlockBuster喉罩和Proseal喉罩的麻醉效果 被引量:4

The Anesthetic Effect of BlockBuster Laryngeal Mask and Proseal Laryngeal Mask in Urology Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨泌尿外科日间手术采用BlockBuster喉罩和Proseal喉罩麻醉的效果。方法选取我院2017年4月—2018年10月的52例泌尿外科日间手术患者进行研究,随机分为对照组和研究组,对照组采用Proseal喉罩,研究组采用BlockBuster喉罩,比较两组患者的临床疗效及并发症发生情况,并对两组患者治疗总有效率及并发症发生情况进行观察。结果研究组的麻醉总有效率明显高于对照组,研究组的麻醉效果明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);研究组的并发生发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论尿外科日间手术采用BlockBuster喉罩后,麻醉总有效明显高于Proseal喉罩,且并发症发生较少。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of blockBuster laryngeal mask and Proseal laryngeal mask anesthesia in day operation of urology surgery.Methods 52 patients undergoing day operation in our hospital from April 2017 to October 2018 were randomly divided into control group and research group.Proseal laryngeal mask was used in the control group and BlockBuster laryngeal mask was used in the research group.The clinical efficacy and complications of the two groups were compared.The total effective rate of the two groups was also compared.The complications were observed.Results The total effective rate of anesthesia in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group,and the anesthetic effect in the study group was significantly better than that in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The total anesthesia effect of BlockBuster laryngeal mask is significantly higher than that of Proseal laryngeal mask,and the complications occur less.
作者 孙菲 高桂芳 郭元丽 宋玲 SUN Fei;GAO Guifang;GUO Yuanli;SONG Ling(Department of Anesthesiology,Shiyan Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital,Shiyan Hubei 442000,China)
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2019年第4期122-124,共3页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 泌尿外科 日间手术 BlockBuster喉罩 PROSEAL喉罩 麻醉 并发症 urology surgery daytime surgery BlockBuster laryngeal mask Proseal laryngeal mask anesthesia complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献65

  • 1邓晓明,杨冬,魏灵欣,廖旭,张雁鸣,罗茂萍,胥琨琳.全麻患者经Cookgas气管插管型喉罩盲探气管插管的可行性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(3):224-226. 被引量:18
  • 2黎介寿.对Fast-track Surgery(快通道外科)内涵的认识[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(8):515-517. 被引量:364
  • 3徐文峰,张海滨,陈勇,林哲,李棠煊,王健.两孔法腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术临床分析[J].国际医药卫生导报,2007,13(24):42-44. 被引量:6
  • 4Jellicoe JA, Harris NR. A modification of a standard laryngoscope for difficult tracheal intubation in obstetric cases[J]. Anaesthesia, 1984, 39(8): 800-802. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb06528.x.
  • 5Ferson DZ, Rosenblatt WH, Johansen MJ, et al. Use of the intubating LMA-FastrachTM in 254 patients with difficult-to- manage airways[J]. Anesthesiology, 2001, 95(5): 1175-1181.
  • 6Gerstein NS, Braude DA, Hung O, et al. The FastrachTM intubating laryngeal mask airway : an overview and update [J]. Can J Anaesth, 2010, 57(6): 588-601. DOI:10.1007/s12630-010-9272-x.
  • 7Kapoor S, Jethava DD, Gupta P, et al. Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel and LMA Fastrach as conduit for endotracheal intubation [J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2014, 58 (4): 397-402. DOI:10. 4103/0019-5049.138969.
  • 8Karim YM, Swanson DE. Comparison of blind tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA Fastrach' and the Air-QTM [J]. Anaesthesia, 2011, 66 (3): 185-190. DOI:10. 1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06625.x.
  • 9Amomyotin S, Sanansilp V, Amomtien V, et al. Effectiveness of lightwand (Trachlight) intubation by 1st year anesthesia residents[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2002, 85(Suppl 3): $963-$968.
  • 10髙学,魏威,田鸣.声门上气道工具//邓小明,姚尚龙,于布为,等.现代麻醉学第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014: 1034.

共引文献90

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部