期刊文献+

我国高等学校哲学社会科学社会服务能力研究

Analysis on the Social Service Capability of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Chinese Colleges and Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提高高校哲学社会科学的社会服务能力,既是回应重大理论与现实问题的新要求,也是提升国家软实力的使命所在。文章通过问卷调查和深度访谈等方法发现,我国高校哲学社会科学社会服务能力在服务意识、理论储备、能力水平、成果转化和智库建设等方面已取得了显著成绩,但也存在主动服务意识淡薄、服务能力有限、服务信息不对称、成果转化率偏低、社会服务能力有待加强等问题。在此基础上,提出了提高高校哲学社会科学的社会服务水平、提高思想认识、增强人文社会科学辐射能力、强化人文社会科学的宣传作用、提高社会服务反应能力、加强高校哲学社会科学话语体系和国际传播能力建设等六点对策建议,为新时代我国高校哲学社会科学社会服务水平提升到一个新高度提供参考。 Improving social service capability of philosophy and social sciences in colleges and universities is not only a new requirement for responding to major theoretical and practical problems,but also a mission to enhance China's soft power.Through questionnaire survey and in-depth interviews,the paper finds that the social service ability of philosophy and social sciences in China has made remarkable achievements in service awareness,theoretical reserve,ability level,achievement transformation and think tank construction,but also has a weak sense of active service and service ability,limited service capability,service information asymmetry,low conversion rate of results,and to-be-strengthened social service capabilities.Apart from this,six countermeasures are proposed to raise the level of social service of philosophy and social sciences in China's universities to a new height in the new era.
作者 王志章 曾智洪 李秋秋 Wang Zhizhang;Zeng Zhihong;Li Qiuqiu
出处 《创新》 2019年第1期93-110,共18页 Innovation
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"提高哲学社会科学服务能力研究"(10JZDH005) 国家社科基金重点项目"西部地区精准脱贫与乡村振兴融合的路径设计与政策"(18ASH006) 西南大学2018年度人文社会科学研究重大项目培育项目(18XDSKZD001)
关键词 哲学社会科学 社会服务能力 高等学校 现状分析 Philosophy and Social Sciences Social Service Capability Colleges and Universities Status Quo Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献25

  • 1范松仁.高校学术道德的缺失与重振[J].天津职业大学学报,2005,14(4):43-46. 被引量:12
  • 2Michele Lamont,2005. Peer Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities Compared The Unites States, United Kingdom, and Frnace[J]. Report prepared for the Social Sciences and Humanities resear Council of Canada, Department of Sociology,, March 24,2005, Harvard University, www. wjh. harvard, edu/-mlamont/SSHRC-peer, pdf, pp. 5.
  • 3Policy Researcg in Engineering, Scince and Technology University of Manchester[J]. Final Report Prepared for Higher Education Funding for England( HEFCE), April 2000, www. unido, org/fileadmin/import/12273_15KeenanAbstraet, pdf, pp. 61-62.
  • 4David H. Guston,The Expanding Role of Peer Review Process in the United States,Public Research, Innovation and Technology Policies in the USA[J]. Bloustein School of Planning & Public Policy,Rutgers,The State University of New Jersey, www. cspo. org/products/papers/peerreview, pdf, pp. 34-35.
  • 5Travis,G. D. L. ,and Harry M. Collins. 1991. New Light on Old Boys:Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Re view System[J]. Science,Technology and Human Values 16(3):322-341.
  • 6Guetzkow,Joshua, Michele Lamont and Gregoire Mallatd. 2004. What is originality in the Social Xciences and Humanities[J]. American Sociological Review 69: 190-212.
  • 7Aalto University, Striving for Excellence,Research Assessment Exercise 2009[EB/OL]. www. aalto, fi/fi/research/rae/aalto_rae _2009_panel_reports. pdf,pp 36 37.
  • 8Gibbons, Michel,Camille Limogers. H elga Nowotny, Somon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trudow(eds). 1994. The New Production of Knowledge[M]. London:Sage Pubulieations.
  • 9Callon, Michel,Pierre Lascoumes and Yan Barthe, Agir Dans un Monde Incertain, Essai Sur la Democratie Technique[M]. Paris: 2001 Seuil.
  • 10朱剑.学术研究,谁人评说…学术评价主体与评价机制的重建[EB/OL].http://cssci.nju.edu.cn/2010年6月1日访问.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部