摘要
设区的市扩容立法以来,激增的地方性法规已非全国人大常委会这一单一备案审查主体所能应对;对其加强备案审查的枢机在于激活省级人大常委会对其的备案审查权。我国宪法与法律对此虽未明确规定,但也留下了由宪法基础、组织基础、备案基础、特有审查基准基础汇聚的制度空间,由此可形成以全国人大常委会、省级人大常委会为双重备案审查主体的设区的市法规审查主体结构。这一双重主体结构合理分工、有效衔接联动,既可维护法制统一、提高地方立法质量,又可为加强备案审查提供示范。
Since districted cities are authorized to enact regulations in 2015, there have been so many local regulations for NPCSC alone to record and review them. The critical point of reinforcing record and review lies in the activation of record and review by PCSC at the provincial level. The Constitution and laws of China do not stipulate explicitly this kind of power of PPCSC, however, provide the important institutional space consisted of constitutional basis, organizational basis, archival basis and special review criteria basis, thus forming the districted city regulations review subject structure that regards NPCSC and PPCSC as the dual subjects. Such dual-subject structure, enjoying reasonable division of work and effective connection, could not only maintain the unity of the legal system and improve the quality of local legislation, but also provide a model for reinforcing record and review.
出处
《政治与法律》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第2期14-24,共11页
Political Science and Law
基金
作者主持的2015年度浙江省哲学社会科学规划重点课题"复合式中国释宪机制研究"(课题编号:15NDJC015Z)的研究成果
关键词
地方立法
设区的市
备案审查
合宪性审查
精细立法
Local Legislation
Districted Cities
Record and Review
Constitutional review
Elaborate Legislation