期刊文献+

腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的短期临床疗效分析 被引量:4

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌患者的短期疗效。方法回顾南方医科大学南方医院2017年4月—2018年3月收治的98例结肠癌患者的资料,根据治疗方案分为观察组(49例,采用腹腔镜行右半结肠切除术)和对照组(49例,采用开腹手术切除右半结肠),比较2组手术时长、术中出血量、不良反应发生率。结果观察组的手术耗时、术中出血量低于对照组,淋巴结清扫数目高于对照组,差异比较有统计学意义(P<0. 05)。观察组的不良反应发生率6. 12%低于对照组的24. 49%,差异比较有统计学意义(P<0. 05)。结论腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌患者效果显著,相较于开腹手术缩短了手术时间,减少了术中出血量,降低了术后不良反应发生率,提高了淋巴结清扫数目,值得推广应用。 Objective To explore the short-term therapeutic effect of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in patients with colon cancer. Methods A total of 98 patients with colon cancer treated in Nanfang Hospital from April 2017 to March 2018, and divided into two groups according to different treatment regimens. The control group received laparotomy and the observation group received laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Results The operative time and intraoperative blood loss of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the number of lymph node dissection was higher than that of the control group which have statistical significance ( P <0.05). The incidence of adverse events in the observation group was 6.12% and significantly lower than 24.49% in the control group ( P <0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is effective in treating colon cancer patients. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery reduces operation time, intraoperative blood loss, reduces the incidence of postoperative adverse events, and increases the number of lymph node dissection, which is worthy of application.
作者 卢一鸣 LU Yiming(Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510515, China)
出处 《转化医学杂志》 2019年第1期22-24,共3页 Translational Medicine Journal
关键词 腹腔镜右半结肠切除术 结肠癌 短期治疗效果 Laparoscopic right colon resection Colon cancer Short-term therapeutic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献35

  • 1West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesoeolie excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically su- perior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colonJ. 1 Clin 0nc01,2010,28(2) :272-278.
  • 2Eiholm S, Ovesen H. Total mesocolic excision versus traditional resection in right-sided colon cancer-method and increased lymph node harvest [ J ]. Dan Med Bu11,2010.57 ( 12 ) : A4224.
  • 3Siani LM, Pulica C. Stage I-lff C fight colonic cancer treated with complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation: quality of surgical specimen and long term oncologic outcome ac- cording to the plane of surgery [ J ]. Minerva Chir, 2014,69 (4) : 199-208.
  • 4Storli KE, Sondenaa K, Fumes B, et al. Short term results of complete ( D3 ) vs. standard ( D2 ) mesenteric excision in colon cancer shows improved outcome of complete mesentefic excision in patients with TNM stages I - II [ J ]. Tech Coloproctol,2014,18 (6) :557-564.
  • 5Galizia G, Lieto E, De Vita F, et al. Is complete mesocolic exci- sion with central vascular ligation safe and effective in the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancers'?. A prospective study [ J ]. Int J Colorectal Dis,2014,29( 1 ) :89-97.
  • 6Kanemitsu Y,Komori K,Kimura K,et al. D3 lymph node dissection in right hemieoleetomy with a no-touch isola- tion technique in patients with colon eaneer[J]. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum,2013,56(7):815-824.
  • 7王浩.传统手术与改良右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌临床应用价值评析[J].医学信息,2015,14(z3):269-270.
  • 8Feroci F,Lenzi E,Garzi A,et al. Intracorporeal versus ex- tracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemi- colectomy for cancer:A systematic review and mcta-anal- ysis[J]. International journal of colorectal disease, 2013,28 (9) : 1177-1186.
  • 9Ding J,Liao GQ,Xia Y,et al. Laparoscopie versus open fight hemicolectomy of colon cancer:A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Tech- niques,Part A,2013,23(1):8-16.
  • 10Lira M,Hussain Z,Howe A,et al. The oncological out- come after right hemicolectomy and accuracy of CT scan as a preoperative tool for staging in right sided colonic cancers[J]. Colorectal Disease:The Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ire- land, 2013,15(5) :536-543.

共引文献50

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部