摘要
与国际专利分类体系(IPC)相比,合作专利分类体系(CPC)具有更为细化、精准的分类特点,文献标引量适中,具有较好的降噪效果,有助于更加高效的检索。本文通过对比制浆领域CPC与IPC的分类情况,并结合实际检索案例对CPC的检索特点加以阐述。
Compared to International Patent Classification (IPC), Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) has more detailed and accurate classification characteristics, and the index of the literature is moderate, which has better noise reduction effect and helps to search more efficiently. This paper compared the classification of CPC and IPC in the pulping field, and describes the search characteristics of CPC by the practical case.
作者
南松楠
李轲
NAN Songnan;LI Ke(Patent Examination Cooperation Henan Center of the Patent Office, CNIPA, Zheng zhou Henan 450018)
出处
《河南科技》
2018年第36期33-37,共5页
Henan Science and Technology
关键词
CPC
IPC
分类
制浆
检索
CPC
IPC
classification
pulping
retrieval