论虚假诉讼的识别及其规制——以最高人民法院2016年第68号指导案例为例

A Paper on the Identification and Regulation of False Litigation——Take as an Example No. 68 Guiding Cases by Supreme Court in 2006

虚假诉讼在司法实践中大量存在,侵蚀了法庭的权威。尽管立法者通过立法的完善对剔除该畸形现象的用意已跃然纸上,但目前存在的种种现实问题使我们不得不反思现行虚假诉讼的识别难问题及其制度缺陷。因此结合虚假诉讼制度的现实困境并针对性地对第68号指导案例进行梳理分析,进而提出审慎识别虚假诉讼、扩大虚假诉讼规制范围、提高违法成本,建立事中救济机制、引入案外人提起损害赔偿之诉的救济途径的建议。

False litigation widely exists in judicial practice and erodes the authority of the court. Although the legislator's intention to eliminate this abnormal phenomenon through the perfection of legislation has leaped to paper,we have to rethink the hard problems with identifying the current false litigation system and its system defects because of various practical problems.Therefore,with a combination with the practical dilemma of the false litigation system and targeted analysis of No.68 guiding cases,the paper aims to put forward some suggestions on a prudent identification of false litigation,expanding the scope of false litigation regulation,increasing the cost of violations,establishing a relief mechanism in the event and introducing a way of relief for damages by outsiders.