期刊文献+

网络语音同一性鉴定中的共振峰差异分析 被引量:7

DIFFERENCE ANALYSIS OF FORMANT IN NETWORK VOICE IDENTIFICATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语音同一性鉴定中共振峰的特征比对是认定同一的重要方法。司法鉴定中的语音检材大多来自于录音笔等电子设备,而网络语音的出现相对于通常的语音同一性鉴定是一种挑战。即时通信软件在传输网络语音的过程中为了保持网络传输的低带宽占用,对语音进行高比例的压缩,因此即时通信软件产生的网络语音的共振峰特征相对于原始语音会有变化。选取当前互联网社交领域常用的5款即时通信软件,通过实验分析出即时通信软件产生的网络语音与原始语音在共振峰特征上的差异。研究结果表明,不同即时通信软件在不同元音的共振峰特征上会呈现出变化差异,通过总结变化差异可以提高即时通信软件的网络语音同一性鉴定的准确率。 In the identification of voice identity, the feature comparison of formants is an important method to identify. Most of the voice samples in forensic identification come from electronic devices such as recording pens, and the appearance of network voice is a challenge to the usual voice identification. In the process of transmitting network voice, IM software compresses the voice in a high proportion in order to maintain the low bandwidth occupied by network transmission. Therefore, the formant characteristics of network voice generated by IM software changes compared with the original voice. In this paper, we selected five IM software commonly used in the field of Internet social networking and analyzed the differences of formant characteristics between the network voice generated by IM software and the original voice through experiments. The results show that the formant characteristics of different vowels vary with different IM software. And we can improve the accuracy of network voice identification by summarizing the differences.
作者 张晓 孔华锋 王海燕 刘文超 Zhang Xiao;Kong Huafeng;Wang Haiyan;Liu Wenchao(Key Laboratory of Information Network Security, Third Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security, Shanghai 201204, China;Wuhan Business University, Wuhan 430056, Hubei, China;College of Criminal Justice, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China)
出处 《计算机应用与软件》 北大核心 2019年第3期187-191,共5页 Computer Applications and Software
基金 公安部科技强警基础工作专项项目(2017GABJC33)
关键词 网络语音 共振峰 差异 Network voice Formant Difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献28

  • 1杨俊杰,李晓勇,崔效义,李敬阳,王莉,冯祖祎.双胞胎语音共振峰频率特性的差异性研究[J].中国人民公安大学学报(自然科学版),2005,11(4):20-22. 被引量:5
  • 2[2]张迺华.简明声病学.北京:人民卫生出版社,1985.76.
  • 3Aitken, C.G.G., Taroni F. 2004. Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
  • 4Baldwin,D. J. 2005. Weight of Evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles. Chichester, U.K. : Wiley.
  • 5Daubert, U.S. SupremeCourt 1993. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 113 S Cr 2786.
  • 6RodriguezJ.G., RoseP, etaL 2007. Emulating DNA: rigorous quantification of evidential weight in transparent and testable forensic speaker recognition. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Signal Processing Society, 15 (7) : 2104-2115.
  • 7Rose P. 2003. The technical comparison of forensic voice samples, Expert Evidence, Issue 99: Thomson, Sydney, Australia.
  • 8Kinoshita Y. speaker identification ratio-based approach 2001. Testing realistic forensic in Japanese : a likelihood using formants. Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University.
  • 9RoseP, OsanaiT, KinoshitaY of forensic speaker identification evidence: 2003. Strength multispeaker formant- and cepstrum-based segmental discrimination with a Bayesian likelihood ratio as threshold. Speech Language and the Law. 10(2) : 179-202.
  • 10Rose, P. 2007 ion with Australian English Forensic speaker discriminat - vowel acoustics, Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences Universit?t de Saarlandes, Saarbr fi cken, Germany: 1817-1820.

共引文献18

同被引文献288

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部