期刊文献+

以审父视角探析《台阶》中人性之悲 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 《台阶》作为一篇经典文章被重新安排编写进了新版语文教材七年级下册的第三单元,是一篇自读课文。该单元的导语是想告诉读者小人物虽然平凡,且有弱点,但在他们身上又常常闪现优秀品格的光辉,引导人们向善、务实、求美。新教材倡导由教读课文——自读课文——课外阅读的三位一体模式,所以通过前两篇文章《阿长与〈山海经〉》《老王》的学习,我们不仅感受到“阿长”和“老王”两个小人物的光辉品质,同时也分析了造成他们悲剧的时代背景因素。
作者 黄宇
出处 《语文教学与研究》 2019年第5期25-27,共3页
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1郭贵春.“科学修辞学转向”及其意义[J].自然辩证法研究,1994,10(12):13-19. 被引量:14
  • 2[2]John Dewey. How We Think. Boston: D. C. Heath. 1910.
  • 3[3]Robert Ennis, "Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception." Teaching Philosophy, 1991,14( 1 ).
  • 4[4]Sharon Bailin, Roland Case, Jerrold Coombs, and LeRoi Daniels. "Operationalizing Critical Thinking: A Curriculum,Instruction and Assessment Model." Paper adapted from Bailin et al., "A Conception of Critical Thinking for Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment," funded by the British Columbia Ministry of Education and Minister responsible for Multiculturalism and Human Rights, May 1993.
  • 5[5]Facione, Peter A.. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction ( executive summary). In The Delphi Report, Millbrae, CA:California Academic Press. 1990.
  • 6[6]http://www. criticalthinking. org
  • 7[7]Alec Fisher and Michael Scriven. Critical Thinking. Its Definition and Assessment. Edgepress. 1997.
  • 8[8]Kees De Glopper. Book Reviews. Argumentation. Vol. 16.2002.
  • 9[9]R. H. Johnson. ‘The problem of defining critical thinking'.In S. Norris (ed.), The Generalizability of Critical Thinking.Teachers College Press. 1992.
  • 10[10]John Chaffee. Thinking Critically. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. 1988.

共引文献178

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部