期刊文献+

诗经学对情诗的“创造性”误读及文化解读

“Creative” misreading and Cultural interpretation of Love Poems in the Book of Songs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《诗经》中存在大量爱情婚恋诗,可自汉以来的诗经学史,学人们刻意地有"创造性背叛",在这种有创造性的误读中,汉代的"美刺论"、宋代的"淫诗说"及清代的"贞诗说""刺淫说"最具代表性,它们都使《诗经》中的爱情诗处在尴尬地位。这些误读之产生有其历史文化根源和传统,它们为文化经典的发展奠定、人文道德大厦之构建及诗性之生成亦起了一定作用。 There are a large number of love poems in the Book of Songs.However,in the research history on the Book of Songs since Han Dynasty,scholars deliberately had"creative betrayal".In this kind of creative misreading,the most representative theories are"the Theory of Beauty and Prickle"in Han Dynasty,"the Theory of Lust Poems"in Song Dynasty and"the Theory of Chastity Poems"and"the Theory of Prickle and Lust"in Qing Dynasty.They all put the love poems in the Book of Songs in an awkward position.These misunderstandings have historical and cultural roots and traditions,including the establishment of cultural classics,the building of humanistic moral edifice and the formation of poetry.
作者 杨子怡 YANG Ziyi(School of Humanities,Huizhou Institute of Economics and Technology,Huizhou,Guangdong,516007,China)
出处 《衡水学院学报》 2019年第2期111-119,共9页 Journal of Hengshui University
关键词 《诗经》 爱情诗 误读 美刺说 淫诗说 刺淫说 the Book of Songs Love Poems misreading the Theory of Beauty and Prickle the Theory of Lust Poems the Theory of Prickle and Lust
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

  • 1布迪厄 华康德著 李猛 李康译.《实践与反思》[M].中央编译出版社,1998..
  • 2.《毛诗序》[A].引自郭绍虞.《中国历代文论选》[C].上海古籍出版社,1996年版.第一册第63页.
  • 3[5]引自杨小清.《艺术构造论》[M].广西师范大学出版社,2000年版.第278页.
  • 4李贽.《焚书》,《书黄安二上人手册》[M].北京:中华书局,1961年,卷二.页77.
  • 5.《四库全书总目·诗类存目一》[M].中华书局,1965年版..
  • 6[10]伍蠡甫编.《西方文论史》[M].上海译文出版社,1982年版.上卷第53页.
  • 7刘文典 撰,冯逸,乔华.淮南鸿烈集解[M]中华书局,1989.
  • 8(汉)韩婴撰许维遹校释韩诗外传集释[M].

共引文献2

;
使用帮助 返回顶部