期刊文献+

儒释道宽恕思想的文化蕴涵 被引量:2

Cultural Implication of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism's Forgiveness Thought
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宽恕是人类最重要的美德之一,西方哲学家、教育学家和心理学家一直占据宽恕研究的支配性和权威性位置,而国内对于宽恕的研究却相对较为匮乏。宽恕,这一带有浓厚宗教色彩的概念在中国文化背景下是否依然适用?笔者在对宽恕进行语义分析的基础上,系统阐释了中国儒释道家宽恕思想的文化蕴涵,并对中西方宽恕思想差异的根源进行了比较。以集体主义为核心、儒释道哲学观为基础的中国文化背景下的宽恕内涵与以个人主义为核心、以宗教思想为基础的西方文化背景下的宽恕内涵虽然存在较大差异,但二者殊途同归,都指向了以爱为核心的人类共同价值追求。 Forgiveness is one of the most important virtues of human beings. Western philosophers, educators and psychologists have always occupied the dominant and authoritative position in the study of forgiveness, while domestic research on forgiveness is relatively scarce.Forgiveness, is this concept with strong religious color still applicable in the context of Chinese culture?Based on the semantic analysis of forgiveness, the author systematically expounds the cultural implications of Chinese Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism’s forgiveness thoughts, and compares the root causes of the differences between Chinese and Western forgiveness thoughts.Although there are great differences between the connotations of forgiveness in the Chinese cultural background with collectivism as the core and Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism philosophy as the basis and in the western cultural background with individualism as the core and religion as the basis, both of them have the same purpose in different ways, which pursue human common values centered on love.
作者 杨晓峰 李玮 郑雪 YANG Xiaofeng;LI Wei;ZHENG Xue(School of Psychology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010022;University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,WI,USA 53705;College of Basic Medicine,Inner Mongolia Medical College,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010059;School of Psychology,South China Normal University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 530631)
出处 《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2019年第2期89-94,103,共7页 Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 内蒙古师范大学高层次人才科研启动经费项目(2016YJRC002)研究成果之一
关键词 宽恕思想 中国传统文化 儒释道 语义学分析 差异比较 the forgiveness thought Chinese traditional culture Confucianism Buddhism Taoism semantic analysis difference comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献65

共引文献67

同被引文献39

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部