近十年《招魂》作者及魂主论争述评

A Review of Argument about the Authors and Soul Owner of Zhao Hun in the Past Ten Years

《招魂》作为《楚辞》中最有争议的作品之一,其作者及魂主问题向为学界论争之焦点。与前期相比,近十年来相关研究论文有所减少,作者说仍以主宋、主屈为主,且持论者约各占一半。而由作者说衍生出的数种魂主说,则以宋玉代屈原自招与屈原自作自招二说最具代表性。综观诸论,宋玉代屈原自招说之考辨系统深入,论证缜密透彻,为众说之最优。

As one of the most controversial works in Chu Ci, the issues of Zhao Hun's author and the soul owner are the focuses of academic debate. Compared with the previous period, related research papers have decreased in the past decade. However, it is still dominated by the proposition of Song Yu and Qu Yuan, and the claimants of the two claims are about half each. Among the several statements of soul owners derived from the different authors, the views that Song Yu wrote and evoked the spirit of Qu Yuan and Qu Yuan wrote and evoked the spirit of himself are the most representative. In summary,the view of Song Yu wrote and evoked the spirit of Qu Yuan is the most convincing because of it's examination is systematic and in-depth and the argumentation is thorough.