期刊文献+

英文发表系统评价再评价研究主题分析 被引量:2

Study on the Research Topic of Overview of Systematic Reviews in English
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析英文发表系统评价再评价的研究主题。方法:检索PubMed,Embase.com和Cochrane Library,检索时间截至2019年1月。由2位研究者按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选出系统评价再评价研究,用BICOMS 2分析软件对主要主题词进行抽取和整理并生成共现矩阵,分别利用NetDraw 2.089和gCLUTO 1.0软件绘制网络关系图和进行聚类分析。结果:纳入1 025篇系统评价再评价的研究,具有实质意义主要主题词1 008个,核心主题词为文献综述、循证医学、Meta分析、肿瘤和锻炼。聚类分析共获得5个研究主题,分别为:主题1:针刺和物理治疗方法在痴呆和疼痛管理中的价值;主题2:循证医学研究方法在精神分裂症和精神障碍结果评估中的应用;主题3:远程医疗在糖尿病和哮喘等慢性疾病患者自我照顾和教育中的价值;主题4:初级卫生保健在发展中国家肿瘤,2型糖尿病和心血管疾病等患者健康状况改善方面的价值;主题5:饮食和锻炼等行为治疗在肥胖和HIV感染中的价值。结论:目前关于系统评价再评价的研究主要集中在远程医疗和补充替代治疗在慢病防治中的价值方面。 Objective:To analyze the research topic of overview of systematic reviews(OoSRs)in English.Methods:The PubMed,Embase.com,Cochrane Library were searched from inception to January 2019,to include the English researches on OoSRs.Two researchers independently selected the papers of OoSRs by inclusion and exclusion criteria,and extracted the major medical subject headings(MeSH)and produced matrix by BICOMS 2 software,the figure of network by NetDraw 2.089,cluster analysis by gCLUTO 1.0.Results:A total of 1 025 OoSRs involving 1 008 major MeSH with substantial meanings were included.The five major MeSH were Review Literature as Topic,Evidence-Based Medicine,Meta-Analysis as Topic,Neoplasms,and Exercise.The MeSH were divided into 5 research topics,research topic one:the value of acupuncture and physical therapy for dementia and pain management.Research topic two:the research method of evidence-based medical for outcome assessment of schizophrenia and mental disorders.Research topic three:the value of telemedicine for patient′s self-care and education of diabetes and asthma.Research topic four:primary health care for improving the health status of tumor,cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes patients in developing countries.Research topic five:the value of diet and exercise therapy for obesity and HIV infection.Conclusion:The OoSRs focus on the aspects of telemedicine and complementary therapies for chronic diseases.
作者 王盼杰 王稼祥 张福利 蔡润津 田金徽 WANG Pan-jie;WANG Jia-xiang;ZHANG Fu-li;CAI Run-jin;TIAN Jin-hui(The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University,Gansu Lanzhou 730000,China;The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University,Gansu Lanzhou 730000,China;Evidence-based Medicine Center,Evidence-based Nursing Center,Lanzhou University,Gansu Lanzhou 730000,China)
出处 《中国药物评价》 2019年第1期10-14,共5页 Chinese Journal of Drug Evaluation
基金 兰州大学2015教学研究项目(项目编号:201525 项目名称:本科教学中"任务驱动"项目教学法的研究与实践--以循证医学课程为例) 甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室开放基金(项目编号:20170203 项目名称:循证医学方法学研究) 秦惠君与李政道中国大学生见习进修基金资助(项目编号:LZUJZH2038 项目名称:系统评价再评价证据主题剖析和研究能力分析)
关键词 系统评价再评价 研究主题 Overview of systematic reviews Research topic
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献135

  • 1张惠康,钱宗才,屈景辉,李军,许卫中,刘敬华.专家系统及其在医疗诊断中的应用[J].医学争鸣,2002(S1):73-76. 被引量:1
  • 2苏键,谭平,周福霖.土木工程专家系统的应用和发展趋势[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2006,23(4):6-14. 被引量:9
  • 3Becker LA.Umbrella Reviews:what are they,and do we need them? XIV Cochrane Colloquium,Plenary Sessions-Dublin,Ireland,2006.http://www.cochrane-collaboration.com/resources/videos/dublin_plenaries_home.htm.
  • 4Becker LA,Oxman AD.Chapter 22:Overviews of reviews.In:Higgins JPT,Green S,eds.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Version 5.0.2 (updated September 2009).The Cochrane Collaboration,2009.Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 5海森堡,主编.范岱年,译.物理学和哲学:现代科学中的革命.北京:商务印书馆,1981.6-7.
  • 6Kramer S,Langendam M,Elbers R,et al.Preparing an Overview of Reviews:Lessons Learned.Cochrane Colloquium 2009 Virtual Posters.Available from http://www.cochrane.org/colloquium/2009/virtual_posters/?poster=9.
  • 7Oxman AD,Cook DJ,Guyatt GH.Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.VI.How to Use an Overview for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.JAMA,1994,272(17):1367-1371.
  • 8Shea BJ,Grimshaw JM,Wells GA,et al.Development of AMSTAR:a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.BMC Med Res Methodol,2007,7:10.
  • 9Atkins D,Best D,Briss PA,et al.Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.BMJ,2004,328(7454):1490.
  • 10Holger J Schünemann,Andrew D Oxman,et al.Chapter 12:Interpreting results and drawing conclusions.Version 5.0.2 (updated September 2009).The Cochrane Collaboration,2009.Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.

共引文献80

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部