期刊文献+

反思机器人的法律定位

Rethinking the Legal Positioning of Robots
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着人工智能技术不断发展以及域外承认机器人主体地位的实践现状,是否赋予机器人法律主体或其他定位是我国未来立法不得不面对的问题。单纯将其作为客体,不考虑其他法律定位则可能脱离了人工智能高速发展的现实,但是限于科技水平,当前仍处于弱人工智能时代,赋予其法律主体地位不免有些纸上谈兵。因此,将机器人划分为不同法律属性,区分机器人的不同责任承担方式值得借鉴。 Regarding the trend of continuous development of artificial intelligence technology and the practical status quo of recognizing robot’s main body status overseas, endowing robot with legal subject and other positioning or not is a problem that China’s future legislation has to face. Simply adopting it as a guest norm without considering other legal positioning may be divorced from the realistic basis of the rapid development of artificial intelligence. Limited to the level of science and technology, it is still in the era of weak artificial intelligence robot, so who gives robot legal subject is an armchair strategist. Dividing robot into different legal attributes and distinguishing its different responsibilities are worthy of reference.
作者 李锦华 LI Jinhua(Civil and Commercial Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120, China)
出处 《宜宾学院学报》 2019年第2期94-101,共8页 Journal of Yibin University
关键词 机器人 法律地位 格里申法案 Robot legal status Griffin Act
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

共引文献1214

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部