循证护理干预对双相情感障碍躁狂发作患者的影响

Effect of Evidence-based Nursing Intervention on Patients With Bipolar Disorder Manic Episode

目的研究与分析循证护理干预对双相情感障碍躁狂发作患者的影响。方法选取来我院进行治疗的患有双相情感障碍躁狂发作的患者92例,随后采取统计学科学分组法将92例患者分为常规护理组(46例)与循证护理组(46例)。其中我院护理人员对常规护理组患者采取常规护理干预措施进行护理,而护理人员对循证护理组患者采取循证护理干预措施进行护理,随后观察两组患者的韦氏成人智力量表评分(WAIS-RC)等情况。结果循证护理组与常规护理组患者治疗后的韦氏成人智力量表评分(WAIS-RC)比较,前者[(103.8±19.2,15.5±4.3,58.5±11.9,43.2±4.3)分]优于后者[(95.7±17.2,12.5±4.2,52.1±10.8,37.5±5.1)分],数据对比差异具有统计学意义(t=2.632 1,1.964 1,3.703 9,2.969 1,P <0.05)。结论循证护理干预对双相情感障碍躁狂发作患者的影响较大,可以有效地提升患者的认知功能。

Objective To study and analyze the effect of evidence-based nursing intervention on patients with bipolar disorder manic episode. Methods A total of 92 patients with bipolar disorder manic attacks were selected for treatment in our hospital. 92 patients were divided into routine nursing group (46 cases) and evidence-based nursing group (46 cases) by statistical science grouping method. The nursing staff in our hospital took the routine nursing intervention measures for the patients in the routine nursing group, and the nursing staff took the evidence-based nursing intervention measures for the patients in the evidence-based nursing group, and then the WAIS-RC scores of the two groups of patients were observed. Results there were significant differences in the wechsler adult intelligence scale (WAIS-RC) scores between the evidence-based nursing group and the conventional nursing group after treatment, with the former (103.8±19.2,15.5±4.3,58.5±11.9,43.2±4.3) significantly superior to the latter (95.7±17.2,12.5±4.2,52.1±10.8,37.5±5.1). The data were statistically significant (t=2.6321,1.9641,3.7039,2.9691,P < 0.05). Conclusion Evidence-based nursing intervention has a great influence on patients with bipolar disorder manic episode, which can effectively improve the cognitive function of patients.