摘要
目的比较眼罩遮盖法与阿托品疗法治疗屈光不正性弱视的临床效果。方法选择医院2017年5月至2018年6月收治的74例屈光不正性弱视患儿为研究对象,按照计算机随机分组原则将其分为对照组和观察组,各37例。对照组采用眼罩遮盖法治疗,观察组采用阿托品疗法治疗。分析两组临床疗效及立体视锐度。结果观察组患儿治疗总有效率显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。立体视锐度≤60″、立体视锐度80~800″及立体视锐度>800″患儿占比比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论眼罩遮盖法与阿托品疗法治疗屈光不正性弱视,均具有一定的治疗效果,但后者疗效更显著,值得临床广泛推广。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of eye mask covering method and atropine therapy in the treatment of ametropic amblyopia. Methods A total of 74 children with ametropic amblyopia admitted in the hospital from May 2017 to June 2018 were selected as the research objects. According to the principle of computer random grouping, they were divided into control group and observation group, with 37 cases in each group. The control group was treated with eye mask covering method, and the observation group was treated with atropine therapy. The clinical effects and stereoacuity of the two groups were analyzed. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05). There were significant differences in the proportions of children whose stereoacuity was less than 60″, between 80″ and 800″, more than 800″(P<0.05). Conclusion Eye mask covering method and atropine therapy in the treatment of ametropic amblyopia have certain therapeutic effects, but the latter is more effective and worthy of clinical promotion widly.
作者
齐晓芸
王芳
QI Xiao-yun;WANG Fang(the People's Hospital ofWuqi County, Yan'an 717600;the First People's Hospital of Xianyang, Xianyang712000, China)
出处
《临床医学研究与实践》
2019年第7期81-82,共2页
Clinical Research and Practice
关键词
屈光不正性弱视
眼罩遮盖法
阿托品疗法
ametropic amblyopia
eye mask covering method
atropine therapy