近代朝鲜“亲清守旧事大”与“亲日开化独立”的再考析

Re-analysis on the “Qinqing-Shoujiu-Shida” and “Qinri-Kaihua-Duli” in Modern Korea

近代朝鲜史研究往往将朝鲜国内政治势力划分为“亲清守旧事大”和“亲日开化独立”两个对立的阵营。然而,这种对立的建构却与史实不符,并带有日本殖民史观色彩。实际上,“亲日”不能和“开化”“独立”画等号,而“亲清”也不能和“守旧”“事大”画等号,近代朝鲜存在多维度的阵营势力划分。因此,有必要对其进行重新整理和分析,而这将为解读当时朝鲜国内政治和近代中朝关系提供新的视角。

In modern Korean history studies, the political forces in Joseon are often divided into two opposing camps, namely,“Qinqing-Shoujiu-Shida” and “Qinri-Kaihua-Duli”. However, The establishment of the opposing camps runs counter to the historical fact, and is compromised by the point of view influenced by Japanese colonialism. In fact,“Qinri” doesn t equate “Kaihua” and “Duli”, and “Qinqing” also doesn t equate “Shoujiu” and “Shida”. There was a multi-dimensional division of forces in modern Korea(Joseon), which should be reorganized and could provide a new perspective for understanding modern Korea s domestic politics and the relationship between China(Qing) and Korea(Joseon).